GTX 1080 Octanebench?

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
User avatar
glimpse
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:17 pm
Contact:

moritzw wrote:it's been 8 months, still no news on that topic?
Hi there, Jules stated that OTOY made some progress with help from nvidia optimising =) let's wait a bit more.

Overall Pascal cards are pretty fast already =)
User avatar
Goldorak
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 2321
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:09 pm
Contact:

Yes - Marcus tracked this to its source in the CUDA stack, and we have reported and shared these findings with NVIDIA at their request. NVIDIA has been extremely supportive and helpful during this process, and we all hope to use the results of this work to try to avoid a similar issue when Volta comes .

Octane on Pascal (in my testing) is faster than Maxwell on the same TDP. After this addressed (we are working to get this done ASAP), Octane will be even more optimized on Pascal, and we will finally add Pascal officially to OctaneBench.
rrbarb
Licensed Customer
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:40 am

Thanks for the update!


Now if NVIDIA would release Pascal drivers for OSX - or - MAC OS, as they prefer to refer to this. Anyone who uses web drivers for Maxwell cards in Mac Pro, take a couple mins and go to NVIDIA site, chat them up about getting the web drivers up to Pascal.

./rrb
Iceman9
Licensed Customer
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22 am

Thanks Glimpse, Goldorak for the update.

It's been 6 months and like many pros here the #1 motivation to buy a next-gen card from Nvidia is for GPU rendering.

All of Pascal's amazing improvements are mute if the software pipeline can't capitalize. We understand that Nvidia's Cuda 8.x may be at fault so we aren't fault-finding w/Otoy...just expressing our eagerness.

I purchased a 1080 last summer but I'll be stay on the sidelines waiting to buy two new 1080 TI. Once this is worked out I'll proceed with that purchase. That will likely drive me to buy a third Octane license as well...

I hope to do my wee little part in rewarding all parties engaged in the resolution here. :D
User avatar
Goldorak
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 2321
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:09 pm
Contact:

Last update from Marcus was that we may get Pascal support wrapped up in 3.06 and, if that is the case, release a new OB based on 3.0.6 shortly thereafter.

We may refresh OB again after 3.1 is out, due to all the changes we want to capture with OSL. We expect (and hope) relative speed on modern cards won't change much, and OB will likely remain normalized with a 980 as ~100 OB.
User avatar
Chriz
Licensed Customer
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:53 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Hi there.

I made a test yesterday and to my disappointment my new 1080 (which i choose, after one of my 980 Tis said goodbye) was slower than my old 780s. And much slower, than my remaining 980 Ti. For example i had around 25 M/sec on 1080 and in the same simple scene, just refresh on 980 Ti i had around 45 M/sec. :(

So, is there any idea what can cause this? Is there a possiblility, that this gap will be closed with 3.0.6 ?

Best Chris
http://www.C9W.de - Win10 - Dual E5 2620v3 - Display 1 GTX 1080 / Render 1 3090 RTX - 96 RAM - C4D MSA - C4D Plugin version: current - Standalone: current
User avatar
Elvissuperstar007
Licensed Customer
Posts: 2515
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Ukraine
Contact:

Chriz wrote:Hi there.

I made a test yesterday and to my disappointment my new 1080 (which i choose, after one of my 980 Tis said goodbye) was slower than my old 780s. And much slower, than my remaining 980 Ti. For example i had around 25 M/sec on 1080 and in the same simple scene, just refresh on 980 Ti i had around 45 M/sec. :(

So, is there any idea what can cause this? Is there a possiblility, that this gap will be closed with 3.0.6 ?

Best Chris
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=58820
Win11/msi x79a-gd45 (8d)/ Intel Xeon e5 2690v0/ 64gb DDR3 1866/ Nvidia 4090 Asus TUF/ be quiet! Straight Power 11 1000W 80 Plus Platinum
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
User avatar
Chriz
Licensed Customer
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:53 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Thanks, i already knew that threat.

And first: Someone mentioned there he has no problem with mixing maxwell and pascal cards
second: of cause i deselected the cards in Octanesettings and tested them seperatly.

So i am not sure, what i could learn from that threat? Did i miss something? :roll:

@ Elvissuperstar007

best chriz
http://www.C9W.de - Win10 - Dual E5 2620v3 - Display 1 GTX 1080 / Render 1 3090 RTX - 96 RAM - C4D MSA - C4D Plugin version: current - Standalone: current
MildMustard
Licensed Customer
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 6:00 am

Chriz wrote:Thanks, i already knew that threat.

And first: Someone mentioned there he has no problem with mixing maxwell and pascal cards
second: of cause i deselected the cards in Octanesettings and tested them seperatly.

So i am not sure, what i could learn from that threat? Did i miss something? :roll:

@ Elvissuperstar007

best chriz
What are your temps like, maybe your card is being throttled.
User avatar
Chriz
Licensed Customer
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:53 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Temps are low.

Both, the 980 TI and the 1080 are connected via PCI 16x to 1x USB3 raisers. But this is not be the problem, because both card working well this way and 1080 is just computing much slower than expected. The only effect by this raiser stuff is a little slower data transfer to the gpus. The 980 Ti works as great as if its directly plugged into the board.

The both 780s are directly plugged into the mainboard.

Any suggestions?
http://www.C9W.de - Win10 - Dual E5 2620v3 - Display 1 GTX 1080 / Render 1 3090 RTX - 96 RAM - C4D MSA - C4D Plugin version: current - Standalone: current
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”