Perhaps this is best considered a feature request, as I dont think there is any way to do this currently
I think we need a curve to map emission to match anything resembling TFD emissions
For instance here is an image with a properly scaled emission
As you can see only the hottest parts of the temp channel are actually emitting
Now look with IPR gamma of 8
Closer...as we can see the emission does indeed include some of the detail in the temp channel seen in the TFD openGL preview...just showing the values are there and emitting
Now here is normalized
Clearly you are seeing all the detail is present in the temperature channel, but if you see the power and efficiency values, this is not a workable solution
It almost acts as if there is a lower limit to the emission, the lower temp elements do not have enough power.
Could there be a way in the future to apply a mapping curve to the emission input? So that we can have a more logarithmic mapping....increasing the power of the lower temp elements.
Octane seems pretty good for clouds and smoke....but a little weak on the fire end
Possible to apply a curve to emission mapping
Moderator: juanjgon
- mdharrington
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:08 pm
Intel i7 980, 24gig DDR3, 2x GTX 470, 1x GTX 590
- mdharrington
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:08 pm
I think part of the problem is my TFD sim is scaled from 600 to 2300 for temp....pretty standard for TFD
Whereas octane likes 2000 to 7000
EDIT:
That should be compensated for by the emission scaling in the octane_volumetrics properties...
But the numbers make no sense....scaling 600 to fall into the 2000 lower limit would be something like 3.3, but instead a number like 3200 is more appropriate?????
Anyhow, a curve over the emission mapping would be useful
Whereas octane likes 2000 to 7000
EDIT:
That should be compensated for by the emission scaling in the octane_volumetrics properties...
But the numbers make no sense....scaling 600 to fall into the 2000 lower limit would be something like 3.3, but instead a number like 3200 is more appropriate?????
Anyhow, a curve over the emission mapping would be useful
Intel i7 980, 24gig DDR3, 2x GTX 470, 1x GTX 590