Number of cores vs clock speed

A public forum for discussing and asking questions about the demo version of Octane Render.
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
maccam
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:45 am

I'd like to know what is more important for a better performance in octane, more cuda cores or less cores but with higher clock speed.
The later is true for gaming (in fact an overclocked GTX460 performs quite close to the GTX470 despite having just 336 cores)
but I'm not sure about cuda applications like octane

Thanks
Curious guy
Licensed Customer
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 4:19 am

my way for having an idea is multiplying # of cores by clock to get an "overall clock sum" of the GPU.
3 x Geforce GTX470 | i7 960 | MB x58 classified 4 way sli | Win 7 64bit | 6Gb | Driver 257.21
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

Hi,

Overclocking GPUs for use with octane is a very bad idea as octane taxes the GPU %100 and you have a big chance of damaging your GPU with overclocking it.

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
Zay
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:53 am

Speaking of GPU load. I was watching GPU-Z while rendering a simple scene.
In Pathtracing mode my GPU load was 95-97% and the GPU temp was 90C.
Swithing to Directlighting the GPU load dropped to 82-85% and the GPU temp dropped to 87C.
Is there a reason why directlighting doesn't run on full throttle like Pathtracing does ?
Win 11 Pro | i5 12600K | 32GB ram | 2x GTX 1080Ti + 3080Ti - studio driver 560.94| Modo/Blender/ZBrush/Daz/Poser
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

directlighting is quicker/easier to compute.
on small resolutions you might reach your vsync or tonemapping limit.

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
maccam
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:45 am

Many GTX460 have been released with factory OC so If I decided to overclock myself I can assume it's OK as long as I can keep the temperature within safe limits, right?
Anyway this all was about which card is better for octane: an OC'ed GTX460 2GB or a GTX470 as both are similary priced.
Odeas
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:28 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

As long as at full load for about 10-15 mins your within manufaturer recommended limits then an OC shouldn't be a problem.
Remember, OC'ing too far can cause instability and graphics glitching so be careful if your really pushing it!

I plan on upgrading to a 460 2GB and will probably apply a mild overclock. (I'll show results when I manage to get one!)
Here a 470 is about £40-50 more than the 460 2GB and only has 1280MB so to me its a no brainer (I can always wait a little longer for the render but can never increase the amount of available vram)
Post Reply

Return to “Demo Version Questions & Discussion”