It was rendered at twice the resolution and scaled down in Photoshop. Fireflies were removed with that clever little Defly app
No post other than that.Thanks for looking
First attempt at a car render
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
With all the great car renders that have been posted, I thought I'd give it a try. This is not my own model - I think it's from Dosch Design. Getting the materials right is tricky so I definitely need to work on that in the future, but none the less, this is definitely the best car render I've ever produced, IMHO.
It was rendered at twice the resolution and scaled down in Photoshop. Fireflies were removed with that clever little Defly app No post other than that.
Thanks for looking
It was rendered at twice the resolution and scaled down in Photoshop. Fireflies were removed with that clever little Defly app
No post other than that.Thanks for looking
- Attachments
-
Gigabyte GTX460 1GB @ 715MHz | Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | 4GB DDR2 | WinXP 32-bit
Thanks
You're right - it does look small. I wonder why that is - maybe the DOF is too strong. I also used a lot of vignetting because I like that effect
Are there any useful ground rules to follow with car visualizations? Or do you just keep tweaking till it looks right?
You're right - it does look small. I wonder why that is - maybe the DOF is too strong. I also used a lot of vignetting because I like that effect
Are there any useful ground rules to follow with car visualizations? Or do you just keep tweaking till it looks right?
Gigabyte GTX460 1GB @ 715MHz | Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | 4GB DDR2 | WinXP 32-bit
One thing you should try remember while training is that a strong dof is not a real term at all. Most people think that the words "strong dof" is a shallow dof with only a small part in focus. This is false.
Dof is the area in focus. So alot of dof means alot is in focus and a small dof is macro shots.
You need to add real life scale to the scene, that is what truly lacks. So what is real life scale? Well that is something that tells tou that the car aint microscopic or giant. Right now there is only a car and nothing else. Your ground has no texture thus its not possible to determin scale. Same goes for the background. Make textures and props that puts the car in relief.
Dof is the area in focus. So alot of dof means alot is in focus and a small dof is macro shots.
You need to add real life scale to the scene, that is what truly lacks. So what is real life scale? Well that is something that tells tou that the car aint microscopic or giant. Right now there is only a car and nothing else. Your ground has no texture thus its not possible to determin scale. Same goes for the background. Make textures and props that puts the car in relief.
Amiga 1000 with 2mb memory card
"Strong DOF effect" is perfectly normal term, even among photographers. It refers to wide open aperture (small F-Stop number, shortening shutter speed)[gk] wrote:One thing you should try remember while training is that a strong dof is not a real term at all. Most people think that the words "strong dof" is a shallow dof with only a small part in focus. This is false.
Dof is the area in focus. So alot of dof means alot is in focus and a small dof is macro shots.
Actually "Small dof is macro shots" is your made up terminology
and it doesn't make sense at all !When people say too strong DOF for short (I am one of those who do too) it's usually to point out it's complete unnecessary-ness is such pictures. People just basically over-use it since it's so easy to play with it here, but it ends up out of place for most of the time.
Intel C4Q , 4G ram, GTX 285,
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of ... ected=true
Dof is whats in focus. Lots of dof, lots of stuff in focus.
Dof is whats in focus. Lots of dof, lots of stuff in focus.
Amiga 1000 with 2mb memory card
"Are there any useful ground rules ?"
Yes there are First, no simple flat plane, unless you want to model highway or parking place, have backplate matching your HDRi, use simple studio setup, ie. basic half-U-shape, like in photo studios, erasing your horizon line.
Interesting HRDi will make for nice reflections too.
Yes there are
First, no simple flat plane, unless you want to model highway or parking place, have backplate matching your HDRi, use simple studio setup, ie. basic half-U-shape, like in photo studios, erasing your horizon line.Interesting HRDi will make for nice reflections too.
Intel C4Q , 4G ram, GTX 285,
No, I answered this.[gk] wrote:http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field?wasRedirected=true
Dof is whats in focus. Lots of dof, lots of stuff in focus.
"In optics, particularly as it relates to film and photography, the depth of field (DOF) is the portion of a scene that appears acceptably sharp in the image"
This is what you refer to, and also the "shallow/deep" part terminology.
I mentioned none of that. I simply explained how it changes meaning when people have in mind the whole "DOF effect (stress on latter word)" simply shortcutting it into "Dof". "Strong DOF (effect) " doesn't correspond to neither shallow nor deep.
Ok, let's lay it off. This is pointless off-topic argument. I know that you know what DOF is, but at same time, I know you can see it's wrong in most of the pictures. Post(send) them this link.
Intel C4Q , 4G ram, GTX 285,