Totally unscientific 1080 vs 1070 benchmark

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Post Reply
ron908
Licensed Customer
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:55 am

So, since I just had both a 1080 and a 1070 in my machine, I thought I'd try them both on the octane benchmark scene.

I just opened the benchmark scene 2.17 in the 3.02 standalone demo and looked at the Ms/s results

Windows 10, nvidia driver 372.54

All measurements after ca. 1 minute render time

1x GTX 1080 Founders Edition
Test Ms/S
ATV Info: 38.6
ATV DL: 17.9
ATV PT: 14.9
ATV PMC: 5.3

Box Info: 60
Box DL: 12.2
Box PT: 11.5
Box PMC: 4.5

Idea Info: 80
Idea DL: 19.2
Idea PT: 17.7
Idea PMC: 4.4


1x GTX 1070 Gigabyte G1 Gaming
Test Ms/S
ATV Info: 32.5
ATV DL: 14.5
ATV PT: 12.3
ATV PMC: 5.4

Box Info: 56.6
Box DL: 11.7
Box PT: 11.5
Box PMC: 5.1

Idea Info: 74
Idea DL: 17.5
Idea PT: 16.6
Idea PMC: 4.4


There was surprisingly little difference between the 1080 and 1070. The 1070 however is slightly overclocked by default, while the 1080 was a stock founders edition. Still, at 40% extra cost, I barely got something like 10% extra render power from the 1080. But take this with a grain of salt of course...
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Thanks for results. IMO comparing same technology GPUs is rather obvious - cuda cores, core clock and memory matters. If you could post results for older gpu would be useful. OctaneBench still does not support Pascals.
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
ron908
Licensed Customer
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:55 am

smicha wrote:Thanks for results. IMO comparing same technology GPUs is rather obvious - cuda cores, core clock and memory matters. If you could post results for older gpu would be useful. OctaneBench still does not support Pascals.
Well the reason I posted it was because I was surprised how little difference there was between the two cards, seeing as how in gaming benchmarks the 1080 is sometimes almost always _significantly_ faster than the 1070, whereas here it is barely 10-20%.

A colleague ran the same benchmark on his (oc'd) 980TI and those were his results:
Idea Scene:
Info: 93
DL: 23,5
PT: 21,5
PMT: 5,7

Not the same machine underneath of course, but still, it gives a good impression that at _this_ point in time, if you need render power right now, the 980 Ti are still the way to go. Especially taking their price into account.
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Thank you for the scores - very informative. We need full Pascal suport/full speed.
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”