No benchmark for Titan X Pascal ?

[Lewis]

Will we add the Titan X (pascal) as 'Titan XP' on the OctaneBench scorelist?
to make a difference with the ('older') Titan X already listed.

PS
What a strange choice of Nvidia choosing the same name, but we have to deal with that

No worry for OctaneBench confusion yet since OctaneBench 2.17 don't support any of Pascal GPUs anyway.

I think they will have to make OctaneBench 3.x when time permits.

[Timmaigh!]

Is there actually anyone over here who owns this card and can shed some light on its performance? I am mostly interested if there are some performance improvements when compared to GP104, or it performs pretty much like 1080 would if it had 1000 cuda cores more...

thanks

[smicha]

Here are a few benchmarks for the ZOTAK AMP! Extreme card. These were made using Octane Render 3.02 and the benchmark scene in Lightwave 3D rendered at 1280x720:

ASUS Titan X 12GB alone - 43 seconds
ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme alone (also being used for monitor displays) - 41 seconds
ASUS Titan X 12GB + ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme - 21 seconds
ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme + ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme - 20 seconds

The 1080 was slightly better. Hopefully when Octane is optimized for Pascal GPUs there will be significant rendering improvement.

Could you please run same scene with any older card so that we could compare it the new XP?