Was published today in Commercial forum:
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=55274
Cheers, mib
GTX 1080 no compatible with OCTANE V3!??
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
- mib2berlin
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:18 pm
- Location: Germany
Opensuse Leap 42.3/64 i5-3570K 16 GB
GTX 760 4 GB Driver: 430.31
Octane 3.08 Blender Octane
GTX 760 4 GB Driver: 430.31
Octane 3.08 Blender Octane
Yes, just released: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=55274Lewis wrote:Ohhh , really, that's new ?mib2berlin wrote:Hi, just for info, the latest Octane version is working on Pascal.
Cheers, mib
any benchmark scores ?
Thanks
but please read the disclaimer at the top of the post.
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
Thank you for pointing this out.
I'm just a little worried about the stuff in red letters though (Experimental, and performance is not at the level we expect)...
I'm more conflicted now between getting GTX 1080s (more power but non-guaranteed performance) or the GTX 980 Tis (less power but tested and known performance)... why is it always like that when trying to upgrade a PC

For the record I will upgrade the CPU to the new i7 9650x (Deca-core) and the RAM to 64 GB but it is the Graphics cards that I am so confused about... I know I know... I should be patient and wait for proper support for GTX 1080 and then we can see the actual performance and make a sound judgement.
But you see my problem is that patience is not a virtue of mine, (please consider that I have been waiting for at least 2 years to upgrade)
So if you were as impatient as I am, what would you do?... I'm open to suggestions even those involving other GPU components (as long as the price is reasonable not as crazy as the TITAN Z or TITAN X),
Thanks,
- Phantom107
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:31 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Really eager to see what the GTX 1080 is capable of. Thinking of getting one GTX 1080 hybrid or two GTX 980 ti hybrids
Developer of tools for Octane:
Phantom Scatter - Phantom Node Link - Phantom Photo Match - Phantom Architecture
Phantom Scatter - Phantom Node Link - Phantom Photo Match - Phantom Architecture
Despite the lack of known performance you're still getting more video Ram with the 1080s. I've hit the limit with my 980Ti cards a few times when working with large scenes (CAD conversions) in C4D.yalbaiz wrote: I'm just a little worried about the stuff in red letters though (Experimental, and performance is not at the level we expect)...
I'm more conflicted now between getting GTX 1080s (more power but non-guaranteed performance) or the GTX 980 Tis (less power but tested and known performance)... why is it always like that when trying to upgrade a PC![]()
,
- L_Sprangers
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:12 am
Will GTX 1080 support be available for Octane plugins (C4D, Maya, etc...) at the same time as the Standalone version?
- stratified
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 6:32 am
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Yes, as soon as the plugin developers release their plugins with version 3.03.2, the plugins shall have support for Pascal cards.L_Sprangers wrote:Will GTX 1080 support be available for Octane plugins (C4D, Maya, etc...) at the same time as the Standalone version?
cheers,
Thomas
- Daniel_Ward
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 2:57 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
- Contact:
Hi Team,
I can't provide any meaningful benchmark data, but I've just changed out a couple of my GTX970's for some GTX1070's with no problems so far.
The Rendering with Octane on the 1070's is noticeably faster and I no longer have to micromanage by ArchVis scenes around my VRAM like I was previously doing on some of our larger projects.
I'm using the ArchiCAD Plugin.
Looking forward to seeing how much faster the Dev team can get Octane running on these cards.
Cheers, Dan.
I can't provide any meaningful benchmark data, but I've just changed out a couple of my GTX970's for some GTX1070's with no problems so far.
The Rendering with Octane on the 1070's is noticeably faster and I no longer have to micromanage by ArchVis scenes around my VRAM like I was previously doing on some of our larger projects.
I'm using the ArchiCAD Plugin.
Looking forward to seeing how much faster the Dev team can get Octane running on these cards.

Cheers, Dan.
+MAP Architects, Christchurch - New Zealand
ArchiCAD 4.12 - ArchiCAD 24 || Octane for ArchiCAD
i7-7700K - Gigabyte Aorus Z270X Gaming 9 - 32Gb RAM - 3x Gigibyte GTX1070 G1 Gaming - Window 10 64Bit
ArchiCAD 4.12 - ArchiCAD 24 || Octane for ArchiCAD
i7-7700K - Gigabyte Aorus Z270X Gaming 9 - 32Gb RAM - 3x Gigibyte GTX1070 G1 Gaming - Window 10 64Bit
Can you maybe render same frame with single 970 and then repeat process with 1070 ? That will give us pretty good indication how much % is faster.Daniel_Ward wrote:Hi Team,
I can't provide any meaningful benchmark data, but I've just changed out a couple of my GTX970's for some GTX1070's with no problems so far.
The Rendering with Octane on the 1070's is noticeably faster and I no longer have to micromanage by ArchVis scenes around my VRAM like I was previously doing on some of our larger projects.
I'm using the ArchiCAD Plugin.
Looking forward to seeing how much faster the Dev team can get Octane running on these cards.
Cheers, Dan.
Thanks
--
Lewis
http://www.ram-studio.hr
Skype - lewis3d
ICQ - 7128177
WS AMD TRPro 3955WX, 256GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090, 1 * RTX 3090
RS1 i7 9800X, 64GB RAM, Win10, 3 * RTX 3090
RS2 i7 6850K, 64GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090
Lewis
http://www.ram-studio.hr
Skype - lewis3d
ICQ - 7128177
WS AMD TRPro 3955WX, 256GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090, 1 * RTX 3090
RS1 i7 9800X, 64GB RAM, Win10, 3 * RTX 3090
RS2 i7 6850K, 64GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090
I've just done a COMPLETELY UNSCIENTIFIC TEST comparing the Titan Z (single processor), 780 6gb, 980ti and 1080 (display card).
On the same frame (simple geo with heavy displacement) the scores were:
TITAN Z (Single processor) - 4min51s
780 6gb - 5min10sec
980ti - 2min47
1080 (being used as display card) - 2min53
So there you go, some initial numbers. Be interesting to see how it goes when things are more optimised!
On the same frame (simple geo with heavy displacement) the scores were:
TITAN Z (Single processor) - 4min51s
780 6gb - 5min10sec
980ti - 2min47
1080 (being used as display card) - 2min53
So there you go, some initial numbers. Be interesting to see how it goes when things are more optimised!