I sure hope we can see even a temporary/alpha build that makes use of Pascal architecture, because having this card sit around until August seems like an unfortunate waste.azen wrote:wrapthereal66 wrote:NOOOOOOO , juste buy a 1080 ! and what ? is not compatible ?
guys please make a quick update ! because i can"t work right now !
The core Octane team will be able to push the needed updates once the final version of 8.0 is released. There are current development processes that would only be upended if we pushed for 8.0 at this current point. Once the proper 8.0 toolkit is in hand, we can comment in more concrete terms about 1080 compatibility
GTX 1080 no compatible with OCTANE V3!??
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Win10 | i7 5960X | Nvidia GTX 1080 FE & EVGA GTX 1080 Ti Sc | 64 GB RAM
Octane Standalone | Octane C4D Plugin
Octane Standalone | Octane C4D Plugin
Remember, guys:
When the GTX 680 came out, everyone was drooling because it has 3 x more CUDA cores than the GTX 580.
But then...
The 680 turned out to be slower than the 580!
we will see.
When the GTX 680 came out, everyone was drooling because it has 3 x more CUDA cores than the GTX 580.
But then...
The 680 turned out to be slower than the 580!
we will see.
Intel i7-970 @3,20 GHz / 24 GB RAM / 3 x EVGA GTX 580 - 3GB
+1 on an Octane build based on the CUDA 8 RC that is already available..
it will not be any slower..unless code will not run very good =) From al lthe result on the web we've seen from other software houses.. Yo ucan expect same of like 25% better performance in CUDA aplications (soem results are even better, but I guess something fishy going on there =)gueoct wrote:Remember, guys:
When the GTX 680 came out, everyone was drooling because it has 3 x more CUDA cores than the GTX 580.
But then...
The 680 turned out to be slower than the 580!
we will see.
This and the fact that performance is not directly tied to the number of CUDA cores and the 1080 does not simply boast an up in CUDA cores, mind you I've upgraded from a single 780 Ti to the 1080 (hoping to add in another when I can get the cash).glimpse wrote:it will not be any slower..unless code will not run very good =) From al lthe result on the web we've seen from other software houses.. Yo ucan expect same of like 25% better performance in CUDA aplications (soem results are even better, but I guess something fishy going on there =)gueoct wrote:Remember, guys:
When the GTX 680 came out, everyone was drooling because it has 3 x more CUDA cores than the GTX 580.
But then...
The 680 turned out to be slower than the 580!
we will see.
Win10 | i7 5960X | Nvidia GTX 1080 FE & EVGA GTX 1080 Ti Sc | 64 GB RAM
Octane Standalone | Octane C4D Plugin
Octane Standalone | Octane C4D Plugin
You bought some very new hardware, without final CUDA driver released by NVDIA (CUDA 8) and you think it's the developpers fault that NVIDIA has not yet released the compatible CUDA code... I think THAT is the jokeGoldrakes73 wrote:Interested. I bought the 1080 and I discover that you can not 'use in octane v3? please tell me it's a joke?

I have a 1080 but also 2 980ti and for the moment I'm waiting for CUDA8 without blaming OTOY, and use only the 2 980Ti
Windows 10 Pro
Ryzen 3900x / 32Go Ram
1 x GForce RTX 2080Ti Founder Edition
1 x GForce 1080 Founder Edition
Ryzen 3900x / 32Go Ram
1 x GForce RTX 2080Ti Founder Edition
1 x GForce 1080 Founder Edition
Just an update for everyone: The last two days I spent some time on trying the CUDA toolkit 8 release candidate, but there are multiple issues with it so a release based on this toolkit wouldn't work. I'm in touch with NVIDIA, so let's see what they can do.
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
- prehabitat
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:30 am
- Location: Victoria, Australia
great update, thanks Abstraxabstrax wrote:Just an update for everyone: The last two days I spent some time on trying the CUDA toolkit 8 release candidate, but there are multiple issues with it so a release based on this toolkit wouldn't work. I'm in touch with NVIDIA, so let's see what they can do.
Win10/3770/16gb/K600(display)/GTX780(Octane)/GTX590/372.70
Octane 3.x: GH Lands VARQ Rhino5 -Rhino.io- C4D R16 / Revit17
Octane 3.x: GH Lands VARQ Rhino5 -Rhino.io- C4D R16 / Revit17
Thank you so much! I hope they can help.abstrax wrote:Just an update for everyone: The last two days I spent some time on trying the CUDA toolkit 8 release candidate, but there are multiple issues with it so a release based on this toolkit wouldn't work. I'm in touch with NVIDIA, so let's see what they can do.
Win10 | i7 5960X | Nvidia GTX 1080 FE & EVGA GTX 1080 Ti Sc | 64 GB RAM
Octane Standalone | Octane C4D Plugin
Octane Standalone | Octane C4D Plugin
Great to know... Thanks!