Geforce vs Quadro - Why chose?

A public forum for discussing and asking questions about the demo version of Octane Render.
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
PixelNut
Licensed Customer
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 1:04 pm

Hi All,

For discussion - build for all projects. In short Quadro cards are geared for image quality. Gaming cards are geared for speed, for obvious reasons. If you're a 3d artist there is a visible difference between these types of cards in areas such as AA. But with a render engine like Octane speed is the name of the game. So for most folks using Octane a high end Geforce card(s) is a no brainer. However, if you find yourself switching from Octane to other render engines depending on project needs, you may find Geforce cards are not your first choice.

So cutting to the chase. Running a Quadro card in the first/default slot and running say, x2 980 Ti's in other slots should give you the best of both worlds. Having said that, I would like to hear some opinions of tech savvy, 3d folks on running this set up.

Thanks All.
*note: Would like to leave money/affordability out of this discussion.
User avatar
glimpse
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:17 pm
Contact:

if You need Quadro capabilities (ECC, 10BIT output etc.) then Yeah why not.. I would say AMD PROs might offer good value & those PRO features.. otherwise.. if You don't need those..runing 8bit screens, sRGB, no ECC needed..so why to bother.. - there's no good or bad card, jsut one that fits Your needs or don't.
User avatar
grimm
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:11 pm
Location: Spokane, Washington, USA

Yep that's about the best configuration you can have. If you need more speed for Octane there is no reason you need to spend more for quadros when you are not going to use their advantages (what glimpse said). It's just smarter to use faster gaming cards for a third of the price. We are just rendering here, not calculating a finite element analysis for a bridge span or something. :D
Linux Mint 21.3 x64 | Nvidia GTX 980 4GB (displays) RTX 2070 8GB| Intel I7 5820K 3.8 Ghz | 32Gb Memory | Nvidia Driver 535.171
User avatar
gabrielefx
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1701
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:00 pm

if you want high end military component go for Teslas, they can be stressed more than GeForce cards.
For my experience in 5 years I burnt 4 GTX 580s using them 24/7. The latest GeForce cards are built better.
It depends on how many hours you will use and how much you will stress them.
quad Titan Kepler 6GB + quad Titan X Pascal 12GB + quad GTX1080 8GB + dual GTX1080Ti 11GB
User avatar
glimpse
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:17 pm
Contact:

..& how good You cool them =) on a side note You get more speed.. so it's prety good value if have at least 4GPUs to watercool (& will not get any burnouts).
Post Reply

Return to “Demo Version Questions & Discussion”