Octane Hardware Setups

A public forum for discussing and asking questions about the demo version of Octane Render.
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
jbehne1989
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:25 am

Hey everyone,

I'm thinking to purchase octane as a new renderer for C4D.
At the moment I'm working on

a Mac Pro :

CPU - 2x3,06 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
RAM - 64 GB 1333 MHz
Graphiccard - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048mb


I know the most important thing is the graphic card, but my question is a little bit more specific.
I think in generell it is a great Hardware Setup but do you guys think, switching to Octane still brings more performance instead off keeping renders on this cpu?

What are your opinions/experiences? I really would appreciate your help.

Thanks and cheers
User avatar
aoktar
Octane Plugin Developer
Posts: 16068
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:28 pm
Location: Türkiye
Contact:

Hi,
The renderer uses gpu to calculate images. So most important part is gpu performance. But still we need cpu to detect/collect/prepare and compile the geometry and materials. So a fast cpu would help to work faster, smoother else of image calculation phase.
Octane For Cinema 4D developer / 3d generalist

3930k / 16gb / 780ti + 1070/1080 / psu 1600w / numerous hw
jbehne1989
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:25 am

Thanks for your fast reply.

Makes sense to me. So you still would say, I would render faster using octane instead of standard /physical renderer with my hardware setup?

cheers
User avatar
aoktar
Octane Plugin Developer
Posts: 16068
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:28 pm
Location: Türkiye
Contact:

jbehne1989 wrote:Thanks for your fast reply.

Makes sense to me. So you still would say, I would render faster using octane instead of standard /physical renderer with my hardware setup?

cheers
Maybe hard to beat PR with current setup. 680 is not much fast as 780/780ti or 980/980ti.
But it also depends to scenes. Dof, mblur, blurred reflection/refractions, GI, etc... would have impact on PR vs. Octane. Also Octane's quality is much physical realistic for my personal opinion.

Why don't you compare it on Octane demo with exactly similar materials, illuminations, etc... features?

I found this old and interesting topic for you: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=52260
Octane For Cinema 4D developer / 3d generalist

3930k / 16gb / 780ti + 1070/1080 / psu 1600w / numerous hw
Post Reply

Return to “Demo Version Questions & Discussion”