OctaneRender® for 3ds max® v2.24.2 - 2.16 [OBSOLETE]

Sub forum for plugin releases
Forum rules
Any bugs related to this plugin should be reported to the Bug Reports sub-forum.
Bugs related to Octane itself should be posted into the Standalone Support sub-forum.
Phil_RA
Licensed Customer
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:30 am

A bug about render region that has been around for some time now but it would be nice to see it fixed.

1- Render something, no render region.
2- Pause the render.
3- Change something, like a material property
4- Draw a render region.
5- Unpause the render.
Bug: it will re-render the whole image for a second, then render only on the render region. It shouldn't affect the parts outside the region, it should have stayed as it was.
thanulee wrote:Hello guys, i wanna ask, everytime im upgrading my 3ds max plugin, i have to also upgrade the standalone? thanks
No you don't.
daniel.reutersward
Licensed Customer
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:23 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

daniel.reutersward wrote:I´m a bit confused here as well.

I don´t see any difference in this version? The material editor showed correct result when 3Ds Max Gamma was enable in 2.15?

3Ds Max Gamma enabled + tonemapping enabled = wrong gamma in Octane Viewport.
3Ds Max Gamma disabled + tonemapping enable = correct gamma in Octane Viewport, wrong gamma in material editor.
Nevermind, I tried and it works correct if I use 3Ds Max Gamma 2,2 and Tonemapping.
Materials in the material editor looks correct and if I use "Linear" response the rendering looks correct too.

What I do notice is that the response curves are not updated to match the new gamma settings.
For instance, when using the response curve "Agfacolor_Futura_100CD" there´s double gamma on plugin version 2.16.
I´ve attached 2 screenshots showing this. All settings are identical, I´ve only installed different versions.
Attachments
Plugin Version 2.16
Plugin Version 2.16
Plugin Version 2.13
Plugin Version 2.13
boris
Licensed Customer
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 7:50 am

daniel.reutersward wrote:
daniel.reutersward wrote:I´m a bit confused here as well.

I don´t see any difference in this version? The material editor showed correct result when 3Ds Max Gamma was enable in 2.15?

3Ds Max Gamma enabled + tonemapping enabled = wrong gamma in Octane Viewport.
3Ds Max Gamma disabled + tonemapping enable = correct gamma in Octane Viewport, wrong gamma in material editor.
Nevermind, I tried and it works correct if I use 3Ds Max Gamma 2,2 and Tonemapping.
Materials in the material editor looks correct and if I use "Linear" response the rendering looks correct too.

What I do notice is that the response curves are not updated to match the new gamma settings.
For instance, when using the response curve "Agfacolor_Futura_100CD" there´s double gamma on plugin version 2.16.
I´ve attached 2 screenshots showing this. All settings are identical, I´ve only installed different versions.
yeah that's what I meant by "i can't use tonemapping when 3dsmax gamma is set" in earlier posts. as far as I tested I only can use the non-linear curves when disabling max gamma or set it to 1. is this the right behavior jim?
P6T7 WS SuperComputer / i7 980 @ 3.33GHz / 24 GB / 1500W + 1200W PSUs / 6x GTX 680 4 GB + 1x Tesla M2070 6GB (placeholder :))
User avatar
thanulee
Licensed Customer
Posts: 712
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:00 pm

So if i understood correctly, plus from what i tested a bit:
- Leaving max gamma at 2.2 and tonemapping at 2.2/linear doesnt affect the image it just shows the material browser correct and we got a linear workflow
- Leaving max gamma at 2.2 and tonemapping at 1.0/any LUT is the proper option for LUTs?
ty
User avatar
JimStar
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 3812
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

3ds Max plugin, "Linear" response:
1.png
Standalone, "Linear" response:
2.png
3ds Max plugin, "Agfacolor HDC 400 plusCD" response:
3.png
Standalone, "Agfacolor HDC 400 plusCD" response:
4.png
daniel.reutersward
Licensed Customer
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:23 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

JimStar wrote:3ds Max plugin, "Linear" response:
1.png
Standalone, "Linear" response:
2.png
3ds Max plugin, "Agfacolor HDC 400 plusCD" response:
3.png
Standalone, "Agfacolor HDC 400 plusCD" response:
4.png
Hi Jim, I don´t fully understand?
Everything works nicely except the response curves/LUTs. They are not using the correct gamma compared to earlier versions?

Or do I have to chose between using 3Ds Max Gamma 1,0 and LUTs or 3Ds Max Gamma 2,2 and Linear from now on?
akira
Licensed Customer
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 4:33 pm

daniel.reutersward wrote:
JimStar wrote:3ds Max plugin, "Linear" response:
1.png
Standalone, "Linear" response:
2.png
3ds Max plugin, "Agfacolor HDC 400 plusCD" response:
3.png
Standalone, "Agfacolor HDC 400 plusCD" response:
4.png
Hi Jim, I don´t fully understand?
Everything works nicely except the response curves/LUTs. They are not using the correct gamma compared to earlier versions?

Or do I have to chose between using 3Ds Max Gamma 1,0 and LUTs or 3Ds Max Gamma 2,2 and Linear from now on?
Those film response curves have burned in gamma, you need to set octane's imager gamma to 1.0 when using them, 2.2 for linear response only.
daniel.reutersward
Licensed Customer
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:23 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

akira wrote:
daniel.reutersward wrote:
JimStar wrote:3ds Max plugin, "Linear" response:
1.png
Standalone, "Linear" response:
2.png
3ds Max plugin, "Agfacolor HDC 400 plusCD" response:
3.png
Standalone, "Agfacolor HDC 400 plusCD" response:
4.png
Hi Jim, I don´t fully understand?
Everything works nicely except the response curves/LUTs. They are not using the correct gamma compared to earlier versions?

Or do I have to chose between using 3Ds Max Gamma 1,0 and LUTs or 3Ds Max Gamma 2,2 and Linear from now on?
Those film response curves have burned in gamma, you need to set octane's imager gamma to 1.0 when using them, 2.2 for linear response only.
Yes, the octane imager gamma is at 1.0 and I still get double gamma.
If I set 3Ds Max gamma to 1,0 the material editor previews are completely useless but Octane is acting as it should. If I set 3Ds Max gamma to 2,2 the material editor previews are as they should but only linear response is useful, all the other responses get double gamma.
I really hope this gets fixed or I´m stuck at 2.13 :P
akira
Licensed Customer
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 4:33 pm

daniel.reutersward wrote:
Yes, the octane imager gamma is at 1.0 and I still get double gamma.
If I set 3Ds Max gamma to 1,0 the material editor previews are completely useless but Octane is acting as it should. If I set 3Ds Max gamma to 2,2 the material editor previews are as they should but only linear response is useful, all the other responses get double gamma.
I really hope this gets fixed or I´m stuck at 2.13 :P
ah i see, max's gamma settings now affect octane viewport in 2.16, that's why you get double gamma when max's gamma is set to 2.2.
i think turning off max's gamma is the only way to get rid of double gamma effects now.

and there's still a bug: when use tonemapping is turned on, and response is set to linear, the imager's gamma setting won't work at all.
User avatar
JimStar
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 3812
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

daniel.reutersward wrote: I really hope this gets fixed or I´m stuck at 2.13 :P
Have you ever seen the images I posted for comparison with the same standalone results? viewtopic.php?f=80&t=52130&start=10#p261367
Do you mean it should be "fixed" in standalone? This is a wrong thread if so.
Locked

Return to “Releases”