Hardware upgrade questions

A public forum for discussing and asking questions about the demo version of Octane Render.
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
kmjif
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:35 am

Hi, my system is: Core2duo 3 GHz (Mobo - Asus P5B delux), 6 Gb Ram, Ati x1900 pro

GPU rendering is very intersting for me, i read octane forum and decided to do upgrade - buy GeForce GTX 480... so i have some questions:

1. is it enough to start? (change my ATI card to GTX 480)
2. My MoBo has 2xPCI-16 (v1.0), GTX 480 is x16 v2.0:
- is it important PCI speed for GPU rendering ? ("GTX 480 on x16 v1.0" versus "GTX 480 on x16 v2.0" )
- can i use 2 cards with my processor? (GTX 480 for octane, second for interface)

i want understand is it necessary to upgrade my processor and motherboard

thanks, and sorry for my english
kmjif
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:35 am

p.s. there are different kinds of GTX 480 on the market (different manufactures), is there important difference in parameters above them, what should i take into consideration?
User avatar
kubo
Posts: 1377
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:11 am
Location: Madrizzzz

the only difference in manufacturers are in the cooling the chip is the same, also, there are 2 "qualities" the basic one, and the overcloacked one, the nice thing in the oc is that they have added better cooling, usually less noisy. The 400 series works at 90º which is pretty high and when on load they are pretty noisy. Every brand throws some extra with the card, choose the one you like best and check warranties and such.
windows 7 x64 | 2xGTX570 (warming up the planet 1ºC at a time) | i7 920 | 12GB
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

I think you should stay away from XFX, lots of bad issues reported.
I personally like ASUS, all cards i've bought from them (a 8800GTX, still running fine after 4+ years), and 2x GTX480 (run perfect even in a hot summer office)

I think with ASUS you're probably best off, or evga which also seems to be good products from user reports.

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
kmjif
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:35 am

thanks, but can somebody answer me about PCI-express speed (first post)?
Is GTX 480 on 16x v.2.0 twice faster than GTX 480 on 16x v.1.0 for GPU rendering.
User avatar
kubo
Posts: 1377
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:11 am
Location: Madrizzzz

The pci speed matters at loading scene, so a 2x will be faster, but once loaded in the card (at startup) it doesn't affect render times.
BTW I totally agree about asus, in my experience my best cards have been asus, but also I've only heard good things about evga
windows 7 x64 | 2xGTX570 (warming up the planet 1ºC at a time) | i7 920 | 12GB
havensole
Licensed Customer
Posts: 463
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:31 pm
Location: Rialto, CA USA
Contact:

I've had good luck with Asus. Other good brands are EVGA, as Radiance mentioned, and PNY. I've heard decent things about Galaxy, and they seem to be trying to cut the edge. I bought and MSI and EVGA gtx470 and the MSI has given me a little more of a headache, but not much.

As said above, the only difference you will see from the pcie bus speed is the initial loading of the obj file. after that everything is based on the speed of the card. This is why you can use a Cubix Xpander unit with an Express34 card adapter (pcie x1) and only lose out on time when it loads the scene.
System 1: EVGA gtx470 1280Mb and MSI gtx470 1280 in Cubix Xpander for Octane, AMD 945, 4Gb Ram
All systems are at stock speeds and settings.
kmjif
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:35 am

Now I can answer my question about manufacturer:
Today is not important GTX 480/470 manufacture because all of them get finished v.card from nVidia. They stick their logo and thats all what they do)
Post Reply

Return to “Demo Version Questions & Discussion”