Do smaller textures render faster?

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Post Reply
aeolian001
Licensed Customer
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:00 pm

my scene has quite a lot of textures, most are 1024 up to 3000 pixels. if i were to reduce most of them to 512 would that increase render speed? Was curious if size of textures affects render speed and if anyone else has tested this.


thanks
itsallgoode9
Licensed Customer
Posts: 896
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:04 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

I haven't tested it, but I would guess no, it would not render faster. if you have lots of very large textures it probably would take longer for the render to start, as it's more bytes that needs to get sent to the vram, but once it's in there, I don't imagine it would take longer. That's just my guess though, and I could be wrong, i dunno.
kavorka
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1351
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:40 am

I agree, from everything I have done so far, I see no difference with larger textures. Only time I worry about texture size is if I am getting close to my VRAM max.
Intel quad core i5 @ 4.0 ghz | 8 gigs of Ram | Geforce GTX 470 - 1.25 gigs of Ram
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”