Camera aperture control

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

andrian wrote:Sorry I miss the answer. Thanks , I'll be waiting for this for sure..

Another question not related to upcoming beta but generally it's about more explanation about the futures in cameras, and specific : Realistic**, what its behind this ? Realistic based on point and shoot cameras or (D-)SLR cameras for settings and adjusting parameters or just glare/bloom?
it's a camera with a real lens. (eg of glass pieces)

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
andrian
Licensed Customer
Posts: 641
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:48 pm
Location: Bulgaria
Contact:

WOW :) and controlling of f-stops, aperture and etc.. will be as in real camera? Can we even set the type of lens used ? And what about my wish for emulating flashlight?
Vista 64 , 2x Xeon 5440 - 24GB RAM, 1x GTX 260 & I7 3930 water cooled - 32GB RAM, 1 x GTX 480+ 1x8800 GTS 512
CGsociety gallery
My portfolio
My portfolio2 - under construction
Web site
Making of : pool scene - part1
superrune
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:15 pm
Contact:

This is my first post here, and I'm jumping straight into this topic. Please excuse me for not reading a lot of other posts here, and if this has already been covered.

I purchased Octane a couple of days ago and it seems like an interesting piece of software, I'm quite intrigued by the quality of the images. But I found this use of aperture, ISO and shutter speed to be very confusing and inconsistent.

Inside the Mesh Preview Imager part of the software, you have several values that directly relate to things that a photographer know about, such as ISO, exposure and fstop - even the different film presets for emulating stock (which I would say is pretty hard core, even). At the same time the camera is built up from more arbitrary values that doesn't relate to photography at all. That I find highly inconsistent. I haven't done any animation in Octane, but the exposure, fstop and ISO seems to do the exactly same thing in still images - to provide some kind of gain function over the image.

People using Octane render will most likely have come from other 3D packages, with renderers such as Mental Ray, V-Ray and Maxwell. All of these have physical cameras, and I think most users would expect - for example - the f-stop value to work with the focus.

My point is, this will confuse users coming from other packages. And I think you should choose:

a) Stick with mathematical values, but make them easy to understand and not arbitraty. For example, the focus should have understandable values for focus distance and region of sharpness.

b) Go with the physical camera properties, which for some people might be hard to understand, but will be much more valuable to learn. And which migrating users will be able to use immediately. Fstop and exposure time should be properties of the camera, and not of the Imager.

c) Or provide an option to choose between the two, with the physical camera and mathematical camera being interchangeable.

Sorry to be verbose about it. But the camera is one of the most important things about a renderer (together with lighting). Having a camera that is easy to understand and use is vital to controlling the image process. I hope I didn't sound too rough, but I seriously think improving this would be very beneficial to Octane :)
User avatar
kubo
Posts: 1377
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:11 am
Location: Madrizzzz

andrian wrote:WOW :) and controlling of f-stops, aperture and etc.. will be as in real camera? Can we even set the type of lens used ? And what about my wish for emulating flashlight?
actually with emmitters it would be possible to emulate a flash light, dunno quite how, but I'm sure someone more versed in photography can figure it out.
windows 7 x64 | 2xGTX570 (warming up the planet 1ºC at a time) | i7 920 | 12GB
Scog
Licensed Customer
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 7:41 am

I wonder how efficient the new MLT will be at simulating this kind of thing?
With an emitter, reflector and lense there are a lot of steps for the light to get through before making a complex caustic pattern on a wall.
| Desktop: GTX480 + 8800GTS 320MB, q9550, 4GB RAM | Laptop: Quadro FX 880M 1GB, i7 820m, 4GB RAM |
Chris_TC
Licensed Customer
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:38 am

kubo wrote:
andrian wrote:And what about my wish for emulating flashlight?
actually with emmitters it would be possible to emulate a flash light, dunno quite how, but I'm sure someone more versed in photography can figure it out.
Just create a rectangular emitter, put it slightly above the camera and you're done. It doesn't get much easier.
User avatar
kubo
Posts: 1377
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:11 am
Location: Madrizzzz

well the tricky part about the flash is the timing, I mean, the flash goes miliseconds before the shot is taken, so if you time that right it could be done.
windows 7 x64 | 2xGTX570 (warming up the planet 1ºC at a time) | i7 920 | 12GB
superrune
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:15 pm
Contact:

A flash light is just like a normal light - only closer to the lens (usually), and very cool in colour. I don't see why you would need any custom tools to create that? As soon as Octane supports area lights, creating flashes and other light sources will be very easy. To make really accurate lights though, it would have to support kelvin values and IES (or some other sort of mapping).

Same thing with a flashlight, close to the lens and some good textures to project through it - and it usually looks good.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”