TurbulenceFD

[garytyler]

Is there any support for TurbulenceFD in the current or upcoming versions of the plugin?

[rafg]

If only! Interested to know if that day is coming sometime soon?

[aoktar]

no words yet.

[gordonrobb]

I honestly don't expect this. Octane renders geometry.

[garytyler]

This sounds like something Octane would pull off but it's a rather pricey solution.

http://lesterbanks.com/2014/01/driving- ... -fluids-2/

[dive]

its a nice solution for the time being though ^_^ thanks!

[garytyler]

its a nice solution for the time being though ^_^ thanks!

If you have success with it, drop a reply! Maybe some samples too!

[anti86]

Hi!
Aoktar, is turbulenceFD support possible, or even being talked about at all?

Thanks!

[caffe3]

Like gordonrobb says, it's pretty much impossible today for a GPU renderer to render something that's not geometry. This discussion was had back in 2012, and I don't think things have changed.

If you want a faster TFD render you should get Krakatoa for C4D plugin and render using it. Smoke works great with it, not sure about fire though...

More important question is, does anyone know how to perfectly match the camera (motion blur) settings of octane to c4d's physical renderer?
Cause to get a proper TFD pass for compositing, we need to keep the objects that are in the scene, obscuring or partially obscuring the smoke/fire. So later when we combine the two the smoke/fire won't just be completely on top of the image, but going through objects as it should (partially hidden behind objects that should be in front of it, or in the middle of it).

The best solution would be to ask TFD and OTOY teams to add deep compositing option, then there would be no problem whatsoever to composite the two.

[NVN]

I doon't know where you got your information....but:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX8KeqYLY10

This is full cuda