Speedcomparison maxwell

[face]

I have rendered a 9000x9000 image using a tesla C1060...

that's interesting, do you mean that with your tesla Octane accepts to render above the 4096x4096 "wall" ?

I don´t think so.
Octane don´t accept values over 4096. All over becomes 4096.
At least in the Octane GUI and with the exporter.
Maybe it gives a other soulution...

face

[GeorgoSK]

I think he just meant with different engine

[mlody47]

and I can render 25000X25000 with my cpu.. but this 9000X9000 was with octane?? it cant be .Face pointed the MAIN reason

[nuverian]

Well, I believe that for a better comparison, a bit more complex scene should be used but thanks for that anyway

[Calico Jack]

Interior scene with DOF! That shoud show the real speed gap. I've made couple interior comparisons between OR and MR and I must say that
OR is waaaaaaayyyyyyyy faster than MR. Even after 4 years I'm still pissed because I bought MR - waste of money.

[GeorgeR]

I'd hope that in the future, you can do tiled renders with Octane, which would get around the 4096 limit.

[kattkieru]

Mach Studio is able to render pretty big images by rendering the image in pieces and then seaming it together... is that possible in Octane?