Simple Dining Room

Display your final art here...
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.


For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
royk
Licensed Customer
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2014 4:01 am

GCard: GTX600 x1
Render time: 18Hrs
GI: PT

Image
Image
User avatar (Default)
merid888

nice image, a lot time 18 hours, maybe you should try use diffuse or AO
regards
MaTtY631990
Licensed Customer
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:38 pm

Yes, I agree with Merid888 that is quite a long render time. Here are some options for you to try.

* Use diffuse GI or AO as Merid888 suggested.
* Reducing material brightness and reflection where possible, except for things like glass, will speed up render.
* Reduce emitter resolution to low as possible if you use meshes.
* Turn fake shadows on for light to pass through better. Reduces noise.
* Try PMC and tweak to these settings

maxrejects to 100
caustic blur to 0.03
lower the exploration strength
make direct light importance higher

Also very good render :) .

Thanks.
User avatar
Seekerfinder
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1600
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:34 am

Awesome shot Royk!
Seeker
Win 8(64) | P9X79-E WS | i7-3930K | 32GB | GTX Titan & GTX 780Ti | SketchUP | Revit | Beta tester for Revit & Sketchup plugins for Octane
royk
Licensed Customer
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2014 4:01 am

Actually, I tried many ways, ....diffuse GI and PMC, but the rendering time is slower than PT, thats why i chose to PT for final render. ...anyways Thanks you're comments. :D
MaTtY631990
Licensed Customer
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:38 pm

royk wrote:Actually, I tried many ways, ....diffuse GI and PMC, but the rendering time is slower than PT, thats why i chose to PT for final render. ...anyways Thanks you're comments. :D
Did you output too larger render size than what is currently here.
User avatar
Lewis
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1101
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:30 pm
Location: Croatia
Contact:

Lookign great :).

BTW your GFX card info seems worng? GTX600 is what ? 650, 660, 670, 680, 690 ???

sure it is long rendertime but for 2+ years single card/GPU not so unexpected either.
--
Lewis
http://www.ram-studio.hr
Skype - lewis3d
ICQ - 7128177

WS AMD TRPro 3955WX, 256GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090, 1 * RTX 3090
RS1 i7 9800X, 64GB RAM, Win10, 3 * RTX 3090
RS2 i7 6850K, 64GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090
MaTtY631990
Licensed Customer
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:38 pm

Lewis wrote:Lookign great :).

BTW your GFX card info seems worng? GTX600 is what ? 650, 660, 670, 680, 690 ???

sure it is long rendertime but for 2+ years single card/GPU not so unexpected either.

Actually this is not true, even if a GPU is older does not always mean less powerful. I previously had a GTX 470, which now is 4 years old and that was a fast card but such a beast in terms of power consumption and temperature and for that I have a GTX 750Ti and I can still get interior renders with PMC in a couple of hours and I use a least powerful GPU than say a Titan. I don't believe it is to with hardware completely, but also it is the software and how it develops that will now determine how fast you can produce a render. Period ;) .
User avatar
Lewis
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1101
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:30 pm
Location: Croatia
Contact:

MaTtY631990 wrote: Actually this is not true, even if a GPU is older does not always mean less powerful.
What's not true ? Where did i said that his GPU means it's less powerfull than what ? Can you please point me to part of my sentece what's not true ? Does he have 1 GPU ? YES. Is it 2+ years old GPU (6xx series) - YES. So what's not true here ?

I think you are reading between lines something I didn't say or what you want to believe i said.
--
Lewis
http://www.ram-studio.hr
Skype - lewis3d
ICQ - 7128177

WS AMD TRPro 3955WX, 256GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090, 1 * RTX 3090
RS1 i7 9800X, 64GB RAM, Win10, 3 * RTX 3090
RS2 i7 6850K, 64GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090
MaTtY631990
Licensed Customer
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:38 pm

Lewis wrote:
MaTtY631990 wrote: Actually this is not true, even if a GPU is older does not always mean less powerful.
What's not true ? Where did i said that his GPU means it's less powerfull than what ? Can you please point me to part of my sentece what's not true ? Does he have 1 GPU ? YES. Is it 2+ years old GPU (6xx series) - YES. So what's not true here ?

I think you are reading between lines something I didn't say or what you want to believe i said.
Forget it, it does not matter.
Last edited by MaTtY631990 on Fri Apr 24, 2015 3:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply

Return to “M is for Metaverse Gallery”