OctaneRender™ Standalone 2.03

VIP Information, news and announcements regarding new Octane Render commercial products and releases.
Tugpsx
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1150
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:04 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Thanks for the update
Win 11 64GB | NVIDIA RTX3060 12GB
User avatar
gabrielefx
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1701
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:00 pm

thanks!

I want side by side render in Max!
quad Titan Kepler 6GB + quad Titan X Pascal 12GB + quad GTX1080 8GB + dual GTX1080Ti 11GB
Rikk The Gaijin
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1528
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:28 pm
Location: Japan

aLeXXtoR wrote:
Karba wrote:We are working on displacement. It is no so easy to make as in CPU renders.
Indeed it is! Thank you for your work! :) Noone blames you, I think. We're just reporting the issues. :)
Exactly! Karba always reacts like we are attacking him personally... Relax man, you're doing a great job! ;)
manalokos
Licensed Customer
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 4:43 pm

Hello

When I deactivate a network render node or a GPU on my machine during render I loose all the samples made by that node or GPU, why??
This is complete maddness!
This behaviour has been happening since 1.xx and it is not logical nor useful, could you correct this in future versions?

Example, I have a render using 1 master machine and 1 network machine, if have 1000 samples of render and deactivate the network machine or have a problem with the network itself I get to loose 500 that go to oblivion just like that.

Kind regards
Filipe Alves
User avatar
abstrax
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 5506
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:01 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

manalokos wrote:Hello

When I deactivate a network render node or a GPU on my machine during render I loose all the samples made by that node or GPU, why??
This is complete maddness!
This behaviour has been happening since 1.xx and it is not logical nor useful, could you correct this in future versions?

Example, I have a render using 1 master machine and 1 network machine, if have 1000 samples of render and deactivate the network machine or have a problem with the network itself I get to loose 500 that go to oblivion just like that.

Kind regards
Filipe Alves
It's on our to-do list, but not as easy as it sounds.
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
gordonrobb
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:08 am

Rikk: Is this a displacement that has mid grey as the zero point (like form ZBrush) and therefore you have to use a negative shift amount. I've not downloaded the update yet, but am fairly sure this tearing is happening when you have to use a negative shift to give you a negative displacement. Displacement is superb for straight displacement stuff (ie black is zero), but Zbrush is a real problem.

It's like whatever calculation is being done to displace, is not being done the same way in reverse when using shift. Frustrating, but I have confidence you guys will figure it out. As long as you are working on it?
Windows 8 Pro | i7 3770 OC | 32 GB Ram | Single Titan (plus Black Edition on Order) | Octane Lightwave |
prodviz
Licensed Customer
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 6:00 pm

.exr output darker than .png issue:

http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 17#p194017
Rikk The Gaijin
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1528
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:28 pm
Location: Japan

gordonrobb wrote:Rikk: Is this a displacement that has mid grey as the zero point (like form ZBrush) and therefore you have to use a negative shift amount. I've not downloaded the update yet, but am fairly sure this tearing is happening when you have to use a negative shift to give you a negative displacement. Displacement is superb for straight displacement stuff (ie black is zero), but Zbrush is a real problem.

It's like whatever calculation is being done to displace, is not being done the same way in reverse when using shift.
Precisely. ;)
Also, I need to mention that, even if it still not perfect, the displacement now is way faster than before, so keep it up! 8-)
gordonrobb
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:08 am

Will take a look then. Hopefully the LW will update to this SDK soon too.
Windows 8 Pro | i7 3770 OC | 32 GB Ram | Single Titan (plus Black Edition on Order) | Octane Lightwave |
aufwind
Licensed Customer
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:47 pm

For me it's the opposite way.
Displacement in the following scene is 30% slower than in Version 2.02!

Both Images are rendered with the same settings.
Mesh Import via Obj-Format. The Scene has about 800k Tris.
Displacement is used with the Sofa which has most of the Poly-Count.
Scene is lit by Octane Sun. Direct lighting Kernel. Windows 7. 2x Titan.

I had to lower the Ray-Epsilon Value to 0.001 to get rid of black artifacts
on the sofa, which results in something like a translucency effect on the part that
is hit directly by the sun light. This effect is in Version 2.03 much more subtle now.

First One rendered with 2.03.
General appearance of Displacement looks quite different compared to 2.02.
2.03.jpg
Personally I do like the look of Displacement in Version 2.02 more (besides the glowing thing).
2.02.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Win7 | Gigabyte G1.Sniper 3 | I7 3770K | 2x Titan (Kepler) | 1x Titan X (Pascal)
Post Reply

Return to “Commercial Product News & Releases (Download here)”