Forum rules Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
I'm still a noob at rendering and modeling however I'm slowly learning. I happy with this scene now but in 30 minutes I'll probably nitpick every detail lol #lifeofanartist
Rendered on a 4930K, 32GB RAM, 3 x 780 TIs. Took about 10 minutes to render with PMC at 4000 samples.
The standardproblem with all my own noob renders, too: Edges mathematically sharp, whole thing too perfect for camera image ... it needs a bit of "craggyness" and "dirt" or "dust" etc to come realistically across.
But well if it's the first thng you made, then it's quite good A great base to continue on.
Looks Great! I love the dirt on the metal skin, and the pattern.
I'd consider myself a noob too, so take this comment as one of those innocent observations rather than an educated critique.
the honeycomb pattern cylinder seems to be encased/framed by the upper conical part at the top, but is actually moulded at the bottom into the 30degree (guess) tapered part at the bottom - the difference (framed at top, not at bottom) didn't ring true for me - depends if it was part of your original intent, or just incidental I suppose.
I also give credit to your approach - most of my work is arch-vis, I make money from the design & documentation, but am yet to be consistent in selling the visualisation of itself. as a result the scenes I'm experimenting on are often rather complex to encapsulate as much of the design/aesthetic as possible in a single scene (saves time doing multiple scene setups).
I'll get to my point now! - you've shown good restraint here experimenting with a 'simple' object in/on a simple setting (studio plane) ...
Looks really nice. The main issue I felt was present in the first render was that the front grenade didn't 'feel' like it was actually sitting on the ground with the lack of a contact shadow, but you've nicely addressed that in your second render. Good job.
One more small critique is that in the first render (doesn't apply to the second), the text saying "H. E. Frag" (or something like that) was well worn away, and yet the rest of the grenade was virtually brand new and clean. You're selling it as either brand new or old and dirty, and that created a bit of inconsistency. At least in the second render the text is gone, so it's believable as a freshly made grenade.
Nice modelling and rendering. From the point of view of a technician, I just have to say that in your model, the pin of the grenade has no believable function, as it is only attached to the green handle !
Built this way, it should have alreardy exploded... or not ...as at the opposite part of the handle, the grey part goes a bit too far into the green handle, preventing it to rotate correctly as expected...
French Blender user - CPU : intel Quad QX9650 at 3GHz - 8GB of RAM - Windows 7 Pro 64 bits. Display GPU : GeForce GTX 480 (2 Samsung 2443BW-1920x1600 monitors). External GPUs : two EVGA GTX 580 3GB in a Cubix GPU-Xpander Pro 2. NVidia Driver : 368.22.
Haha, thanks for the feedback. This grenade was based on a concept art--I don't think the artist took the technical aspect into consideration. Things in the SCI FI world are just suppose to work I guess. Good points, I'll definitely take it into consideration for future models