That sounds like a good idea! Haven't tried the standalone version yet though.brasco wrote:Agreed, it's a bit odd. Maybe we should request it in the general forums as it's Octane's core. Maybe they have an explanation for the workflow?EditRoom wrote:Yes, but the focal point is not the issue, it's the aparture.
If I would set a camera's aperture to 2.8 for example, I would expect a shorter depth of field than let's say an aperture of 11.
This is not the case with the Camera Imager, nothing changes except for the exposure amount.
cheers
brasc
You or me?