1.5 is a large update, with a longer release interval than 1.0->1.1->1.2. The goal of putting out a roadmap for 1.5 (which is not something we've done before) was to keep the community up to date on what is coming down the line during this time. BTW, Alembic brings major changes to the Octane ecosystem, and this feature in and of itself is one of the more involved updates we've taken on since release.
Gabriel - there will be release candidate builds with the new features prior to 1.5 showing up in the store, just as with 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2.
Lastly, we do read all the comments and feature requests in the forums. It's safe to say we're all looking at similar things for the major features we'd like to see added to Octane. We've got a large (and growing) development team working on making all this happen as quickly as possible.
However, the deployment of a feature isn't a sure thing until we have it working internally and have done some preliminary QA. In some cases, the reality is that a feature simply can't be added until we're done refactoring large portions of the underlying engine. We've done our best to strike the right balance with 1.5. We're already far along on developing the next round of features beyond 1.5, but we're not ready to announce much more until after 1.5 is out in everyone's hands.
Octane 1.5 features revealed!
Forum rules
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.
Instead of making a new thread, may I request a quick feature here?
Smoothing angle in the material please.
More control, 15 degree smoothing angle, 30, 45 etc. would be greatly appreciated in addition to the enable/disable function. Thanks!
Mikel
Smoothing angle in the material please.
More control, 15 degree smoothing angle, 30, 45 etc. would be greatly appreciated in addition to the enable/disable function. Thanks!
Mikel
Windows 8.1 | OctaneRender® v2.0 | Intel Core i7 4770K | 32GB RAM | x2 GeForce GTX 780 Ti SC (3GB/ea.)
Twitter: MikelMNJ
Twitter: MikelMNJ
- videoprice
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:41 am
Hi,
Any plan for Ptex and multipass rendering?
Thanks,
Richard
Any plan for Ptex and multipass rendering?
Thanks,
Richard
- r-username
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 3:39 pm
"there will be release candidate builds"
I would also like to see a new release candidate build. For me, I liked the frequency of the candidate builds, it gave me a reason to visit the forum and see what is new. I have been visiting the forum less and when I don't see a new download its a bit of a let down.
Stephen
I would also like to see a new release candidate build. For me, I liked the frequency of the candidate builds, it gave me a reason to visit the forum and see what is new. I have been visiting the forum less and when I don't see a new download its a bit of a let down.
Stephen
- FrankPooleFloating
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:48 pm
Just picked up one of my gigs where I render and composite a ton of 3D stuff into existing photography. I am officially ready to test the holy hell out Visibility. And yearning for the chance to be your guinea pig. Oink. (edit: squeeeeak)
Win10Pro || GA-X99-SOC-Champion || i7 5820k w/ H60 || 32GB DDR4 || 3x EVGA RTX 2070 Super Hybrid || EVGA Supernova G2 1300W || Tt Core X9 || LightWave Plug (v4 for old gigs) || Blender E-Cycles
I'm really interested in this. Will we be able to customize anything related to the node graph? Like adding new type of macro input pins or create entirely generic macro containers? Maybe scripting our own pixel blending modes or adding math operations, so you can do more with less input data into a macro node, and the user of the material doesn't need to open it and fiddle with the node graph inside.- Entire API scriptable
Such tools would allow the creation of a more user-friendly higher abstraction of shaders. Currently there is too much limitations, to really achieve the "black box" concept of material macros.
SW: Octane 3.05 | Linux Mint 18.1 64bit | Blender 2.78 HW: EVGA GTX 1070 | i5 2500K | 16GB RAM Drivers: 375.26
cgmo.net
cgmo.net
- FrankPooleFloating
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:48 pm
Does anyone know if Motion Blur (when we eventually get it) is going to increase render times, because of needing multiple passes/samples etc?... or will it be similar to DOF, where it has no effect on render time?
This would be nice to know ahead of time...
This would be nice to know ahead of time...
Win10Pro || GA-X99-SOC-Champion || i7 5820k w/ H60 || 32GB DDR4 || 3x EVGA RTX 2070 Super Hybrid || EVGA Supernova G2 1300W || Tt Core X9 || LightWave Plug (v4 for old gigs) || Blender E-Cycles
DOF has a huge effect on render time (of course, if you use it). You need a lot more samples/px to get a clear render. Mblur is/will be the same.FrankPooleFloating wrote:or will it be similar to DOF, where it has no effect on render time?
Some time ago we were debating about a "sampling brush", that would let the user to paint which areas should get more samples (so not to waste render time on areas that are already clear, while out of focus areas are still noisy). That would be nice...
SW: Octane 3.05 | Linux Mint 18.1 64bit | Blender 2.78 HW: EVGA GTX 1070 | i5 2500K | 16GB RAM Drivers: 375.26
cgmo.net
cgmo.net