oooooh: 12GB VRAM on NVidia Quadro K6000 GPU
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
- xxdanbrowne
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:38 am
Probably will cost your first born son but 12GB of RAM would hold some really nice Octane Render Scenes. A render farm of these would be suh-weet.
- gabrielefx
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:00 pm
wait for the Titan II...
quad Titan Kepler 6GB + quad Titan X Pascal 12GB + quad GTX1080 8GB + dual GTX1080Ti 11GB
I'm not entirely sure that we will see a 12GB Titan II this generation. Sure it's possible that lower binned GK110 chips meant for the K6000 could be turned into Titan II's but they could just as easily show up as normal Titans or even GTX 780s.
Also notice that despite the K6000 having all 2880 cores enabled compared to "just" 2688 on the Titan that it performs slightly slower due to a lower clock. With the Quadro you're really paying for the extra VRAM, qualified drivers and the ability to synchronize multiple displays (up to sixteen 1080p or four 4K with 4 K6000's + the Quadro Sync card) which in turn requires that huge amount of VRAM.
With that said: I wouldn't mind buying a $1200 Titan II that had 12GB of VRAM if it became available.
Also notice that despite the K6000 having all 2880 cores enabled compared to "just" 2688 on the Titan that it performs slightly slower due to a lower clock. With the Quadro you're really paying for the extra VRAM, qualified drivers and the ability to synchronize multiple displays (up to sixteen 1080p or four 4K with 4 K6000's + the Quadro Sync card) which in turn requires that huge amount of VRAM.
With that said: I wouldn't mind buying a $1200 Titan II that had 12GB of VRAM if it became available.