Hmm if divided, it will be more like you can render it 4 times the size with given example ??radiance wrote:Hi all,
Besides that, another great advantage of 2.1 is that when rendering with more than 1 GPU, you can render at higher resolutions.
eg imagine you have 1024MB video ram, and you have a scene which takes 1023 MB (eg full) with say a 1024x512 resolution film.
If you have 4 GPU's with 1024MB video ram, you can render it at 2048x1024, as the film is divided between cards.
Radiance
beta 2.1 release ETA
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Vista 64 , 2x Xeon 5440 - 24GB RAM, 1x GTX 260 & I7 3930 water cooled - 32GB RAM, 1 x GTX 480+ 1x8800 GTS 512
CGsociety gallery
My portfolio
My portfolio2 - under construction
Web site
Making of : pool scene - part1
CGsociety gallery
My portfolio
My portfolio2 - under construction
Web site
Making of : pool scene - part1
2048x1024 has 4x pixels compared to 1024x512.andrian wrote:Hmm if divided, it will be more like you can render it 4 times the size with given example ??radiance wrote:1 GPU... 1024x512 resolution film.
If you have 4 GPU's,you can render it at 2048x1024

Windows 7 64 bit | Geforce GTX 570 | Intel i7 2600 3.9 GHz | 16 GB