Geforce Titan / 780GTX

Discuss anything you like on this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
itou31
Licensed Customer
Posts: 377
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:43 am

Nice !
It is done with all CUDA parameters active ? (GPU Boost OFF).
Is octane based on FP32 or FP64 ?
I7-3930K 64Go RAM Win8.1pro , main 3 titans + 780Ti
Xeon 2696V3 64Go RAM Win8.1/win10/win7, 2x 1080Ti + 3x 980Ti + 2x Titan Black
User avatar
face
Octane Plugin Developer
Posts: 3204
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:10 pm
Location: Germany

itou31 wrote:Nice !
It is done with all CUDA parameters active ? (GPU Boost OFF).
Is octane based on FP32 or FP64 ?
FP32 so much i know...

face
Win10 Pro, Driver 378.78, Softimage 2015SP2 & Octane 3.05 RC1,
64GB Ram, i7-6950X, GTX1080TI 11GB
http://vimeo.com/user2509578
JuM
Licensed Customer
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:07 pm

My priority is not the speed but the memory. I hope they make 8 or 12 gb versions of it
p3taoctane
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1418
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:53 am

I see somewhere in this thread someone saying you can't run more than 8 GPU's in one system.

My experience backs that up as I tried to get 9 going once with 8 rendering and one display. (Using an extension box) and it only saw 8 cards.

It is a little off topic... but WHY IS THIS. Is it a windows limitation, a mother board limitation?

There are Trenton Expansion chassis with 17 PCIe x 16 Gen 2.0 slots so you could fit 8 doubles at least with a 2430 watt PSU incorporated in it. Then as many as 7 more in your connect CPU

I'm guessing if this could have been done... someone would have done it. I tried working with a company to do some tests on cloud rendering... but they were only letting me log into 4 card systems. If OTOy wants to do cloud based rendering I am assuming they will be doing more that 8 cards.

I do not plan on going out and purchasing 16 Titan cards anytime soon... but I bet 580s aree going to come down eventually and a 16 card system would not be out of the question.

Kind of a dreamer topic... but has anyone here looked into why it is only 8?

Peter
Windows 7 Pro_SP 1_64 bit_48 GB Ram_Intel Xeon X5660 2.80 GHZ x2_6 580GTX_1 Quadra 4800
darkline
Licensed Customer
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:56 pm

abstrax wrote:Now that the performance review ban has been lifted: We don't have any cards here yet, but Chris gave it a spin with version 1.10 on one of the review site systems via remote access and the results were, that the Titan is on the benchmark scene (maxdepth 16, no alpha shadows) 60% faster than a GTX 580 and about 10-12% slower than a GTX 690 (using both GPUs).

In my opinion that's fairly impressive and better than I expected and although expensive it may be a good GPU for smaller studios that actually earn money with Octane. You basically get almost the speed of a GTX 690 with 3x as much memory. We have to wait now until those graphics cards actually get sold and arrive here in NZ...

Regarding "optmization" for compute model 3.5 GPUs: A while ago I tried to coax more speed out of a K20c using different build options, but it turned out that the way how we currently build the CUDA stuff for Octane, was already the fastest. I will have a look at it again, when we hold a Titan in our hands, but don't hold your breath. There may no speed gains here.

Cheers,
Marcus
Marcus,

This is exactly the feedback I was looking for - thank you. 60% faster than a 580 is a good starting point even if you cant squeeze the GK110 for any more. Keep us updated with any optimisations as this would really tempt me to buy one over a gtx690

thanks again
Windows 7 64bit/ Intel 3930K/ ASUS Rampage IV/ GTX980ti x 2/ 64GB system RAM
MOSFET
Licensed Customer
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:30 am

abstrax wrote:Now that the performance review ban has been lifted: We don't have any cards here yet, but Chris gave it a spin with version 1.10 on one of the review site systems via remote access and the results were, that the Titan is on the benchmark scene (maxdepth 16, no alpha shadows) 60% faster than a GTX 580 and about 10-12% slower than a GTX 690 (using both GPUs).
Hey Marcus,

I asked a review site earlier with 3 x Titans if they could run the benchmark scene using the demo version (maxdepth 8, alpha shadows enabled) and they were kind enough to give it a go:

1 x Titan = 6.25 Ms/sec
2 x Titan = 12.50 Ms/sec
3 x Titan = 18.86 Ms/sec

While Fooze's 4 x 690 setup at 27.77 Ms/sec should still beat a quad Titan configuration (~25 Ms/sec), having 6GB vs 2GB of VRAM is very tempting.

-M
User avatar
gabrielefx
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1701
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:00 pm

4 x Titan = 25M

less noise
less power
more ram
more textures
quad Titan Kepler 6GB + quad Titan X Pascal 12GB + quad GTX1080 8GB + dual GTX1080Ti 11GB
User avatar
itou31
Licensed Customer
Posts: 377
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:43 am

Thanks for theses bench.
my 2x580 1.5GB do 8.80 Ms/sec (maxdep 8, alphashadow), but often lack of memory.
I'm searching for 580GTX 3G, if cannot, perhaps a Titan soon (for its 6Go and possibility to put it in my little tower)
I7-3930K 64Go RAM Win8.1pro , main 3 titans + 780Ti
Xeon 2696V3 64Go RAM Win8.1/win10/win7, 2x 1080Ti + 3x 980Ti + 2x Titan Black
User avatar
mbetke
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 9:12 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

itou31, I will have two 580 3GB for sale soon. ,)
PURE3D Visualisierungen
Sys: Intel Core i9-12900K, 128GB RAM, 2x 4090 RTX, Windows 11 Pro x64, 3ds Max 2024.2
User avatar
mainframefx
Licensed Customer
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:52 pm
Contact:

JuM wrote:My priority is not the speed but the memory. I hope they make 8 or 12 gb versions of it
Wont happen, manufactures are bound to nvidias standard design.
i7-3930K@4,8GHz | 64GB RAM | 2x GTX 560 Ti 448 | Windows 7 x64 SP1
i7-3930K@4,2GHz | 32GB RAM | 1x GTX 560 Ti 448 | Windows 7 x64 SP1
i7-2600K@4,4GHz | 16GB RAM | 1x GTX 560 Ti 448| 1x Quadro 2000D | Windows 7 x64 SP1
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Forum”