Recent tests .

Discuss or ask critique about your current works
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the left right corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and use pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.


For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
IMPICHMENT
Licensed Customer
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:16 am
Location: Russia| Rostov

I'm waiting for integration into Cinema 4D to replace Vray.
Analyze opportunities Octane, identify strengths and weaknesses.
Here are my tests and developments.
At the moment, almost Octane substitute Vray in architectural visualization. The only thing behind it is that Octane does not support standard procedural shaders (noise, brick, tile) and a system of layers in the texture. Hopefully in the future it will be implemented.
Sorry for my bad English.
picture resolution 1680х1050
PMC 16 maxdepth / 22 hours 14 min / 30 000 samples. Alpha shadows / caustic 0,0000 / GTX 580 - 3GB
Image
PMC 16 maxdepth / 45 hours 19min / 64 000 samples. Alpha shadows / caustic 0,0000 / GTX 580 - 3GB
Image

Image
Last edited by IMPICHMENT on Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:17 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Cinema4D R14.|Octane Stand | Octane for C4D next Corona render
Win8 [64]. I7 3930K . GTX580
jmfowler
Licensed Customer
Posts: 278
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:27 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Contact:

perhaps its the compression on your images but they look very grainy - especially considering how long you had them render in PMC.

I have rendered tons of interior images using PMC at 1080HD they always cleanup within 3-5 hours at 8000 samples ( at 580 speed) , that includes complicated lighting systems, refractions etc.

If its not image compression causing graininess then I would trouble shoot your images because they should not be taking 45 hours on a 580.....
Maya 2013 / W7 64bit / Intel i7 980 / 24GB / Gigabyte gtx 580 3GB + 2*EVGA gtx 680 4gb / MB Gigabyte X58A-UD3R / NZXT Phantom - white/black case
Maya 2013/W7 64bit/Intel i7 3820/16GB/ MB Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 /4*EVGA gtx 680 4gb/SSD 6Gb.s /CM HAF X case
User avatar
IMPICHMENT
Licensed Customer
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:16 am
Location: Russia| Rostov

I think the problem is that the chandelier is very complicated.
It consists of a glass tube filled with crystals.
And on the side is a small light bulb. Light bounces through the glass numerous times. Luminaires on the ceiling are also made fairly - reflector, a light source and glass.
It turns out that the scene is illuminated by almost caustic.
I hope the code will be in octane bidirectional ray tracing,such complex scenes will be rendered twice as fast.
Cinema4D R14.|Octane Stand | Octane for C4D next Corona render
Win8 [64]. I7 3930K . GTX580
Post Reply

Return to “Works In Progress”