Purchase Questions - DazStudio User

A public forum for discussing and asking questions about the demo version of Octane Render.
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
ClairObscur
Licensed Customer
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:31 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Grettings !

I decided to put this question here, because i think i am not the only DS user here :) I wanted to know if you have any dates for the version plugin for Daz Studio 4.5 Pro. ? Because i hesiting to buy the standalone version but is maybe better to wait. I use only Daz, and after what i saw in the annoncements... i dreaming ! :)

Annex question : I plan to buy a laptop soon, and saw some with Nvidia card. Do you have a suggestion or anyone know what NVdiia card is necessary to be sure octane working ?

Sincerly,

C.O
Intel Core I7-3770K | 16Gb Ram | Gigabits GTX 970 Overclocked 4Gb DDR5| SSD Crucial Adrenaline 64Gb | W7Pro 64bits | Octane 3.x + OCDS 3.x
abreukers
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 500
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:28 am

hi there,
Thanks for dropping by!
We do not have a particular release date yet for the integrated daz studio plugin. It is certainly something to look forward to and might be best to wait for it.

For Octane to run, the minimum requirement is for the laptop to have a fermi card with at least 96 cuda cores. This minimum requirement is only to run it but it will slow down everything else, considering that the laptop also uses the video card for other purposes. So for rendering, you'd need a higher number of cuda cores for optimal performance. For example, a DellXPS i7 laptop with a 540M card (96 cuda cores) is great for other stuff but this will still render too slow, while an Alienware M17X-R3 i7 gaming laptop with a 580M (384 cuda cores) is ok for rendering.

As for the kepler cards, these are very power-efficient cards and it also has the possibility for more textures, yet its cuda cores are not comparable to ones in the fermi cards (the 580 will outperform a 680 in terms of rendering speed).

Of course, a desktop still tops. Right now, Octane is being optimized for the gtx 600 cards. So it boils down to your preferences, hopefully this info will be useful for you.
i72630QM @ 2.00GHz | 6GB RAM | 2GB GeForce GT 540M | Win7 64bit
Tugpsx
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:04 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

If you have a computer that runs Octane you can purchase the program and try the Daz2Octane exporter while you wait for the Official Plug-in.
The exporter is in the licensed user section.
Win 11 64GB | NVIDIA RTX3060 12GB
User avatar
ClairObscur
Licensed Customer
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:31 pm
Location: France
Contact:

First, Thx you for yours answers. :)

Yes Tugpsx, i discover Octane Render by a Artist in Deviant Art website. When i saw his work, and how professionnal quality of his rendering, i was impressed. That why i hesiting to buy the standalone version. But the plugin version will be more confortable for me.

Yes abreukers, your informations will helps, even you do not have dates for the plugins sadly. And thx you for this informations about the graphic cards :)

Sincerly,

C.O
Intel Core I7-3770K | 16Gb Ram | Gigabits GTX 970 Overclocked 4Gb DDR5| SSD Crucial Adrenaline 64Gb | W7Pro 64bits | Octane 3.x + OCDS 3.x
teecee2107
Licensed Customer
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:45 pm
Location: Liège - Belgium

ClairObscur (ça sonne français ...) You will need a standalone license anyway. To use the plugin, you will have to buy a standalone license plus an additional (plugin) license. So you might consider buying standalone license now and start using it, then buy the plugin license when it becomes available.
abreukers
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 500
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:28 am

Thanks all for your participation in this post, just a note on the current developments:

This was the case last October 2012:
abreukers wrote: ...
As for the kepler cards, these are very power-efficient cards and it also has the possibility for more textures, yet its cuda cores are not comparable to ones in the fermi cards (the 580 will outperform a 680 in terms of rendering speed).
...
Now about a month after, we are happy to say that the keplers have finally come through and cuda cores from these architectures are now very much at par in terms of rendering speed. So we're still bound to keep our 580s and 590s working, though the efficiency of the new keplers gives the new architecture a really big plus!
i72630QM @ 2.00GHz | 6GB RAM | 2GB GeForce GT 540M | Win7 64bit
User avatar
SimonWM
Licensed Customer
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:58 pm

I just bought a second GTX 580 3GB for dual GTX 580 3GB setup waiting for the DAZ plugin in order to get the best possible performance. I wish I had read this message before about Kepler cards finally coming through with performance because now I need to upgrade my brand new PSU from a TX850M to an AX1200 in order to use both Fermi cards which are power hogs. :cry:
sampakinpa
Licensed Customer
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:46 am
Contact:

abreukers wrote: Now about a month after, we are happy to say that the keplers have finally come through and cuda cores from these architectures are now very much at par in terms of rendering speed. So we're still bound to keep our 580s and 590s working, though the efficiency of the new keplers gives the new architecture a really big plus!
So can you say that the gtx-680 is faster than the gtx-580 and and the gtx-690 is faster than the gtx-590 and so on...
are you talking about version 1.02?
are the kepler cards will be better optimized for octan in the future?
2x Xeon E5-2620, 32 GB RAM, 4X GTX1080ti, Windows 10, Octane 3 for Maya 2018, Radeon HD6450 for disply BRIO Animation ltd
Post Reply

Return to “Demo Version Questions & Discussion”