gtx680 and gtx580 which one is faster

A public forum for discussing and asking questions about the demo version of Octane Render.
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
zhangyufeng
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:50 am

hi all: I have a question,gtx680 and gtx580 which one is faster in octanerender?
thanks.
User avatar
FooZe
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 9:00 pm

Hi zhangyufeng,

For OctaneRender the 580 is faster (depending on the scene the 680 can be around 10-20% slower), however the 680's have the benefit of using less power, they have a higher maximum VRAM and also in coming releases they will have a higher maximum texture limit.

(this is using test release 3.03)

Cheers
Chris.
zhangyufeng
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:50 am

ok,thanks.
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Some scores attached. I'll post OC GTX 680 watercooled soon.
Attachments
3.03_306.23.jpg
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
picajol
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:45 pm

I can found GTX580 for 200€ these days but I dont understand is there any differnce between the manufactured models (PALIT,MSI,GAINWRADS, eVGA, ZOTAC) ?
Would you say that the ratio money/speed makes this card to be the best buy?
Only thing I see lot of people are complaining is 1,5GB ram.
How big scenes are we talking aboth?
Can you render s simple architectual interior (living room, with sofas, tv, objects)?
heretic
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:17 am

a. Difference: there is a difference in those manufacturers. As a rule of thumb (for me) its always Palit since their cards are reliably overclocked by default with a low noise vent.
b. 580 is faster for octane than 680
c. RAM needed really depends on polys and texture images. Even simple interiors but with high detail textures and structures on a Hi-Res render can take loads of RAM. So it all depends on render size, texture and (unique) polys.
d. Generally you can render simple scenes,yet what is simple to you might be complex to others. Considering todays pricing you should imho either go for a GTX 580 or GTX 780

Hope that helps.
ristau
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:23 pm

About to purchase Octane for Rhino. Running both through Bootcamp.
I currently do not have a nVidia/CUDA card and looking at the 680 for Mac. . .

A couple of nuub questions:

If a single card is not enough power I should be able to just add another 680 for Mac right?
Would I then need additional power support for MacPro 5,1?

I currently have a Radeon card driving my Apple 27" display. Can I continue to use that card for display and connect nothing to the 680??

Thanks for any guidance on this
picajol
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:45 pm

Heretic thanx for the information :-)
Any thoughts on the GTX660i maybe?
Has 2GB and runs cooler and quiter tzen GTX580...
User avatar
foxid
Licensed Customer
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 7:07 pm

and is 780 faster for Octane than 580 and whats the diffrent?
q6600 gtx275 4gbRAM Win 7x86
Post Reply

Return to “Demo Version Questions & Discussion”