I know this rocks 2 - rendered with RC3

Display your final art here...
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.

For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
bepeg4d
Octane Guru
Posts: 10356
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 am
Location: Italy
Contact:
Contact bepeg4d

hi, as soon as i have seen the new caustics blur effect showed by karba i have thought that my rocks must be recalculated, so here is the result ;)
this is my first pmc animation, 10 minutes x frame with voxelization at 3000 samples with physical sky.
Here is the link to the old version rendered with hdri:
http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic. ... hese+rocks
ciao beppe
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzTIvx4Zo68&sns=em[/youtube]
Top
User avatar
gabrielefx
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1701
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:00 pm

wow!
quad Titan Kepler 6GB + quad Titan X Pascal 12GB + quad GTX1080 8GB + dual GTX1080Ti 11GB
Top
User avatar (Default)
gueoct
Licensed Customer
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:10 pm

What was wrong with the old version?
i think it looks great, too, if not even more realistic....!
Intel i7-970 @3,20 GHz / 24 GB RAM / 3 x EVGA GTX 580 - 3GB
Top
User avatar (Default)
gueoct
Licensed Customer
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:10 pm

What was wrong with the old version?
i think it looks great, too, if not even more realistic....!
Intel i7-970 @3,20 GHz / 24 GB RAM / 3 x EVGA GTX 580 - 3GB
Top
User avatar
PolderAnimation
Licensed Customer
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:23 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:
Contact PolderAnimation

very nice! The fades to black are annoying, I just what to see the render =).
Win 10 64bit | RTX 3090 | i9 7960X | 64GB
Top
User avatar
bepeg4d
Octane Guru
Posts: 10356
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 am
Location: Italy
Contact:
Contact bepeg4d

thanks gabriele :)
hi gueoct, this is started as a caustic test, from this point of view, i think that there is a big improvement with the new rc3 :roll:
hi polder, here it is ;)
[vimeo]http://www.vimeo.com/53932076[/vimeo]
ciao beppe
Top
User avatar (Default)
thiagobulhoes
Licensed Customer
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:10 pm
Location: Brasil
Contact:
Contact thiagobulhoes

great job!!
Thiago Muradas Bulhões
www.napalmstudio.com.br
Brazil - RS
Top
User avatar
bepeg4d
Octane Guru
Posts: 10356
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 am
Location: Italy
Contact:
Contact bepeg4d

thanks thiago :)
underwater there is a strange little vortex in the middle :shock:
could it be the conjunction of sss and pmc :?:
i need to do more tests with a less complex scene and higher sampling :roll:
ciao beppe
Top
User avatar
TBFX
Licensed Customer
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:43 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

bepeg4d wrote:underwater there is a strange little vortex in the middle
could it be the conjunction of sss and pmc
Yes, I did a shot with heavy atmosphere using sss nearly a year ago now in the first version of Octane that had sss and PMC, although 4 to 5 times faster to converge than PT, gave that strange vortex in the center. I ended up using PT anyway as the low frequency noise in PMC or "splotchiness" as the manual calls it was too obvious in my animation.

T.
Win10 x64|i7-9750H 2.6 GHz|32 GB RAM | RTX2080 max Q 8GB
Top
Post Reply

Return to “M is for Metaverse Gallery”