OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.06 TEST

A forum where development builds are posted for testing by the community.
Forum rules
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
eyeonestudio
Licensed Customer
Posts: 329
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:49 pm
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Contact:

What is the concept of COMPARE-NODE?
What is the situation for? :?
C4D R2025 / Win11 / AMD TR WX Series / 256Gb RAM / RTX3090 / 100GbE
User avatar
haze
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 1003
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 8:57 pm

coilbook wrote:can you guys introduce automatic adaptive sampling check box. For aniamtions
I thought this was pretty interesting (I have some background in parametric optimisation) but I can't really think of a way, unless you are willing to have some frames be more noisy than others. Probably the best thing to do in this scenario is pick an adaptive strength of 0.9 and a noise threshold level that you'd be ok with (ie. as much noise as would not be noticeable).

Unless you were talking about some kind of algorithm to pick the noise threshold?
milanm
Licensed Customer
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:23 pm

coilbook wrote:can you guys introduce automatic adaptive sampling check box. For aniamtions
Hi

Actually that's how it works now by default and it's great for animations! For example, if we have a few frames that need 5000 samples but the rest of the animation looks great with ~100 samples, without AS we would still have to render the entire animation with 5000 samples or somehow animate that setting and THAT is a waste of time. However, with AS, we only set noise threshold to a level of noise we like, set max samples to 5000 and min. samples to something lower than 100 like 10. Adaptive sampling will stop rendering a frame when it's clean so if some frames look clean with 20 samples those frames would render much much faster than others. That will save a huge amount of render time for animations, unless you want your animations to look like a "noisy mess" on purpose, of course. :)

Regards
Milan
Colorist / VFX artist / Motion Designer
macOS - Windows 7 - Cinema 4D R19.068 - GTX1070TI - GTX780
carterner
Licensed Customer
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 9:21 am

can triplanar mapping texture use into Displacement?
coilbook
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3032
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:27 pm

haze wrote:
coilbook wrote:can you guys introduce automatic adaptive sampling check box. For aniamtions
I thought this was pretty interesting (I have some background in parametric optimisation) but I can't really think of a way, unless you are willing to have some frames be more noisy than others. Probably the best thing to do in this scenario is pick an adaptive strength of 0.9 and a noise threshold level that you'd be ok with (ie. as much noise as would not be noticeable).

Unless you were talking about some kind of algorithm to pick the noise threshold?

Thank you. I guess that will work.

Yes I was thinking an algorithm that analyzes each frame and adjusts setting automatically.
coilbook
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3032
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:27 pm

milanm wrote:
coilbook wrote:can you guys introduce automatic adaptive sampling check box. For aniamtions
Hi

Actually that's how it works now by default and it's great for animations! For example, if we have a few frames that need 5000 samples but the rest of the animation looks great with ~100 samples, without AS we would still have to render the entire animation with 5000 samples or somehow animate that setting and THAT is a waste of time. However, with AS, we only set noise threshold to a level of noise we like, set max samples to 5000 and min. samples to something lower than 100 like 10. Adaptive sampling will stop rendering a frame when it's clean so if some frames look clean with 20 samples those frames would render much much faster than others. That will save a huge amount of render time for animations, unless you want your animations to look like a "noisy mess" on purpose, of course. :)

Regards
Milan

Thank you!
coilbook
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3032
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:27 pm

Please add a check box "Ignore Sky after min Adaptive Samples are reached" even if AS is set to let's say 0.6 (where terrains/objects still gets 40% of regular samples even after min target is reached but the sky does not) Since skies render instantly no need to waste any samples on them even if AS is set bellow 1.

This Check Box or a separate one can even apply to parts of object that are directly lit by octane sun since those are like sky get clean fast.

Thank you
Attachments
sky.jpg
User avatar
abstrax
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 5509
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:01 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

coilbook wrote:Please add a check box "Ignore Sky after min Adaptive Samples are reached" even if AS is set to let's say 0.6 (where terrains/objects still gets 40% of regular samples even after min target is reached but the sky does not) Since skies render instantly no need to waste any samples on them even if AS is set bellow 1.

This Check Box or a separate one can even apply to parts of object that are directly lit by octane sun since those are like sky get clean fast.

Thank you
Please have a look at viewtopic.php?f=33&t=59760

The adaptive strength parameter has been removed.
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
Post Reply

Return to “Development Build Releases”