So, still no slave licences..
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
-
renderingz
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:09 pm
"The customer is always wrong" - Otoy
Win `10/ Cinema 4D R17 / 2 x 780 GTX 6GB + 2 x 980ti
-
preciousillusion
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:19 pm
- Location: Stockholm
Besides completely missing the point of what I wrote, maybe it doesn't need to? Since it will come at no extra cost, it only has to be “good enough".Goldorak wrote:...AMD ProRender can't and doesn't compete with Octane in any way.
Really?Goldorak wrote:As with Cycles, you get what you pay for.
Then, seriously, why on earth isn't Octane way cheaper?
If I get what I pay for, what would for example the C4D-plugin price be when it's shipped with complete documentation?
How much will be added once the whole material system isn't an "experimental feature” and on par with the competition?
What price can we expect when there's no risk of being locked out by the licensing system? And so on.
But it doesn't run on Windows Server right? “Supported HW”, does that mean Tesla?Goldorak wrote: If you or any other customer out there wants to use more than 20 GPUs please just email me ([email protected]) and I will set up a call with you and our LA team to figure out an enterprise license solution for your company and also provide guidance on supported HW at that scale.
Please take us up on the offer I made for our team to discuss enterprise support over a phone or skype call. That seems like the best way we can help you address the specific issues you have brought up for slave licences beyond 20 GPUs right now. Maybe we can also learn more from your use case going forward.