Octane Render 2.0 for Cinema 4D previews

Mon May 19, 2014 10:10 pm

i'm doing some tests on particle engine with motion blur on xparticles. This is a quick test with colored emission. This is not good quality, but can give some opinions about possibilities

[vimeo]http://www.vimeo.com/95801318[/vimeo]

Mon May 19, 2014 10:14 pm

Wow, that is going to be very cool to play with great work man!

Mon May 19, 2014 10:42 pm

aoktar wrote:i'm doing some tests on particle engine with motion blur on xparticles. This is a quick test with colored emission. This is not good quality, but can give some opinions about possibilities

looking good

Tue May 20, 2014 12:05 am

awesome. is that the native XP shader? good work!

Tue May 20, 2014 10:28 am

JessicaVines wrote:awesome. is that the native XP shader? good work!

No, it's a standart octane material

Tue May 20, 2014 1:11 pm

I guess my only questions is: does rending in Octane make it faster than rendering in C4D alone, which is pretty quick. What are the other benefits?

Looks great though, and assume it works well with depth of field?

Tue May 20, 2014 3:35 pm

aoktar wrote:
JessicaVines wrote:awesome. is that the native XP shader? good work!
No, it's a standart octane material

Not standart, but standard.

Tue May 20, 2014 4:28 pm

how about x-particles and turbulenceFD?

Tue May 20, 2014 4:37 pm

Weezer wrote:I guess my only questions is: does rending in Octane make it faster than rendering in C4D alone, which is pretty quick. What are the other benefits?

Looks great though, and assume it works well with depth of field?

do you mean rendering in standalone? These all are motion blurred geometry. Of course support all features, also DOF.

Sercasaurus wrote:how about x-particles and turbulenceFD?

this is x-particles. TFD is on future, i hope.

Wed May 21, 2014 1:18 am

aoktar wrote:
Weezer wrote:I guess my only questions is: does rending in Octane make it faster than rendering in C4D alone, which is pretty quick. What are the other benefits?

Looks great though, and assume it works well with depth of field?
do you mean rendering in standalone? These all are motion blurred geometry. Of course support all features, also DOF.

Sercasaurus wrote:how about x-particles and turbulenceFD?
this is x-particles. TFD is on future, i hope.

This! +1

Volume rendering is certainly not urgent, we need stable and fast displacements, motion blur and robust render passes, but fire smoke/clouds/volumes must rate pretty highly i think.

Thanks again for your hard work, appreciate it.