http://www.acma.com/acma/CS_PersonalSup ... rkstations
I added almost the same thing for $3,800 to a existing machine. Plus I have a display card.
I have 1,920 in the 480's and another 240 in the 285 totaling 2,160 cores when rendering with Iray. With Octane I only use the 480's because adding the 285 slows it down.
I don't really like Arion but everything you just said is in Iray.bob30 wrote:Ah Carl, i see what you mean..
Well, if i answer you, people will say that i make an advertising. Never mind. You say you have the money for buying it, and also because you need it now. Then, you could have chose Arion, and there, with multi CPU, multi GPU and LAN support, you could have bought several computers with graphic cards, and be far more faster with not only multi GPU but also multi CPU... but Arion is not affordable for most of octane's customers.
Buying multiple pc's is more expensive and not as fast as the gpu rendering. The massive speed up in Iray and other unbiased renders that also use the CPU comes in when you add the GPU's which are way cheaper. You can throw CPU's at it all day but when you add the GPU's it is night and day in the speed difference. These boxes eliminate the need for a render farm of pc's for small companies.