BdB's not so simple interior with area lights

Display your final art here...
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.

For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
User avatar (Default)
ElectronSpeed
Licensed Customer
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:02 pm
Location: The Netherlands

At this moment I do a benchmark, with the new Tesla device C2050 and compare this device with the older generation Tesla C1060. The joke is the possibility to load big files sizes in the allocated device memory, the Geforce product line has a maximum of 1,5GB allocated device memory. Tesla devices have for example device memory of 4GB for the Tesla C1060 and 3GB for the Tesla C2060 when ECC modus is not activated and 6GB for the Tesla C2070. So the Octane Render file that’s can be loaded can be larger on a Tesla devices instead of a Geforce devices.

For example I made a object file, which has file format of 1,03 GB and like to render it on a Mesh Preview Resolution of 4096 x 3072, full aperture 4K. This will take a 2149,1 MB of the device allocated memory in my Octane Render scene, this file size will not fit on the Geforce allocated broad memory. I hope to finish my benchmarks this week for publishing it on the Octane forum.

Look at this video http://www.mentalimages.com/index.php?id=634
If you listen to his voice his is real scary :oops: , about Octane Render solution :evil: , hahaha. If this IRAY solution was a big thing hi will be more confineable :lol: .
Last edited by ElectronSpeed on Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
User avatar (Default)
Florinmocanu
Licensed Customer
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:49 am

radiance wrote:somehow i just realised why i'm not getting replies from nvidia anymore...

Radiance
My guess is because they own Mental Images thus Iray and Octane is competition.
3930k at 4.4 Ghz, Asus X79, 32GB DDR3. 1 x GTX 980Ti
Top
User avatar (Default)
SurfingAlien
Licensed Customer
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:05 am
Location: Italy

ElectronSpeed wrote:Look at this video http://www.mentalimages.com/index.php?id=634
If you listen to his voice his is real scary :oops: , about Octane Render solution :evil: , hahaha. If this IRAY solution was a big thing hi will be more confineable :lol: .
the Brush controlled area preview is nice... it would be great to have something similar in Octane once the basic things are implemented :)
MacBookPro unibody 2x2.4GHz | 4Gb | 9400M+9600GT 256Mb | OSX 10.6.8
i7 2600-K @3.4GHz | 8Gb | GTX560Ti 2Gb | Windows7x64 | Octane 1.0 b2.52
Top
User avatar (Default)
adrencg
Licensed Customer
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:20 am

radiance wrote:
vimaxus wrote:I know it's difficult to estimate but roughly how far away would you say 2.3 is? 1-2 months?
i can't say, we still have to make lots of stuff, blackbody nodes, light power/watts nodes etc...
then finish MLT, which is tricky.

Radiance
Don't worry. You're moving much faster than that other GPU renderer.
Ryzen 5950x
128GB Ram
RTX 3070 x 3
Top
Post Reply

Return to “M is for Metaverse Gallery”