Rappet,
Could you please do the test on 2.12.1 - latest one and for the following settings:
(Here are scores for single 780 6GB @ 1228mhz core, 7000mhz mem)
PT, Alpha shadows off:
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off ( 8.06 ms/s)
path term power 0 , coherent mode off ( 5.50 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode off (13.50 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode on (14.70 ms/s)
and give us core and memory clocks too. What about temps, fan speed (rpm, %), noise.
OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
Hi Smicha,
These are the results of TitanZ with Octane 2.12.1
@ 940-980mhz core (where can I see the mhz mem?)
PT, Alpha shadows off (>1000 s/px):
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off (15.58 ms/s)
path term power 0 , coherent mode off (10.92 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode off (26.70 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode on (28.59 ms/s)
note: the ms/snumbers are dropping and rising all the time.. these is appr. the average numbers
cheers,
These are the results of TitanZ with Octane 2.12.1
@ 940-980mhz core (where can I see the mhz mem?)
PT, Alpha shadows off (>1000 s/px):
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off (15.58 ms/s)
path term power 0 , coherent mode off (10.92 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode off (26.70 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode on (28.59 ms/s)
note: the ms/snumbers are dropping and rising all the time.. these is appr. the average numbers
cheers,
4090+3089ti & Quad 1080ti
ArchiCAD25, ofcourse Octane & OR-ArchiCAD plugin (love it)
http://www.tapperworks.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/TAPPERWOR ... 9851341126
http://www.youtube.com/user/Tapperworks/videos
now I've just got really frustrated..isn't Z marketed as having ~8TFLOPs, while TitanBlack ~5TFLOPs of SP?
so how on earth TitanZ can almost match 2x TitanBlacks?
Wasn't #OctaneRender relying on SinglePrecision performance?
Or is is the case were it (TitanZ) has been tweaked, after AMD pushed their dual GPU card, nVidia was holding down Z in labs..
..is this performance we are seeing related to some optimisations they've made?
Sorry, for spoiling benchmark thread,..
but maybe anyOne could explain that?
so how on earth TitanZ can almost match 2x TitanBlacks?
Wasn't #OctaneRender relying on SinglePrecision performance?
Or is is the case were it (TitanZ) has been tweaked, after AMD pushed their dual GPU card, nVidia was holding down Z in labs..
..is this performance we are seeing related to some optimisations they've made?
Sorry, for spoiling benchmark thread,..
but maybe anyOne could explain that?
@ Rappet: download msi afterburner - best soft to monitor your gpus (also temps for cpu). Go to settings, choose a desired card and watch the scores - see the screenshot.
PS. Great results for Z - so I must overclock by about +200mhz to get on 2x780 what you have on Z. Just give my the core clock and if it is about 900mhx it means we have a pretty potential room for overclocking at stock volts. So please pass core clock.
@Glimpse - I am not that surprised. I was expecting just 2xTITAN Black performance. Black has 2880 cores, so does Z but x2. Core clock shall be similar, memory clocks too. I would not look at TFLOPS. If the technology for black and Z is same, but just doubled gpus, I expected doubled performance. The only thing I assume might be different - is black might be a better overclocker than Z - same as 580 was compared to 590.
@Rappet - could you please check in nVidia panel settings if you have double precision off (shall be off by default).
So for now I am super happy with my Strix 780 6GB - for two I payed 900$ and got Z performance. But I am almost sure next build will be on 4xZs or even better cards - surely watercooled
PS. Great results for Z - so I must overclock by about +200mhz to get on 2x780 what you have on Z. Just give my the core clock and if it is about 900mhx it means we have a pretty potential room for overclocking at stock volts. So please pass core clock.
@Glimpse - I am not that surprised. I was expecting just 2xTITAN Black performance. Black has 2880 cores, so does Z but x2. Core clock shall be similar, memory clocks too. I would not look at TFLOPS. If the technology for black and Z is same, but just doubled gpus, I expected doubled performance. The only thing I assume might be different - is black might be a better overclocker than Z - same as 580 was compared to 590.
@Rappet - could you please check in nVidia panel settings if you have double precision off (shall be off by default).
So for now I am super happy with my Strix 780 6GB - for two I payed 900$ and got Z performance. But I am almost sure next build will be on 4xZs or even better cards - surely watercooled

3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
Hi,
I have responded to the above in this thread not to hitchhike this thread
http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 9&start=50
Cheers,
I have responded to the above in this thread not to hitchhike this thread
http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 9&start=50
Cheers,
4090+3089ti & Quad 1080ti
ArchiCAD25, ofcourse Octane & OR-ArchiCAD plugin (love it)
http://www.tapperworks.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/TAPPERWOR ... 9851341126
http://www.youtube.com/user/Tapperworks/videos
Here is my Titan's score
PT, Alpha shadows off:
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off ( 7.08 ms/s)
path term power 0 , coherent mode off ( 4.84 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode off (12.02 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode on (13.28 ms/s)
PT, Alpha shadows off:
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off ( 7.08 ms/s)
path term power 0 , coherent mode off ( 4.84 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode off (12.02 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode on (13.28 ms/s)
http://www.sadece.com.tr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
i7 990x // 12GB Ram // 2x Titan X + Titan + 780 // Octane for C4D // Win7 x64
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
i7 990x // 12GB Ram // 2x Titan X + Titan + 780 // Octane for C4D // Win7 x64
- Laticis
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 2:23 pm
- Location: Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
- Contact:
Scores for 2 X Titan Z's
PT, Alpha shadows off:
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off ( 24.00 ms/s)
path term power 0 , coherent mode off ( 17.30 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode off (40.01 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode on (44.26 ms/s)
PT, Alpha shadows off:
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off ( 24.00 ms/s)
path term power 0 , coherent mode off ( 17.30 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode off (40.01 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode on (44.26 ms/s)
Hi Laticis,Laticis wrote:Scores for 2 X Titan Z's
PT, Alpha shadows off:
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off ( 24.00 ms/s)
...
Did you use Octane 2.12?
If so, can you please test score seperately (both appr 12.00?)
The difference is too big, is it not?
I got one TitanZ with score path term power 0.3, coherent mode of: 15.58 ms/s when >1000 s/px)
cheers,
4090+3089ti & Quad 1080ti
ArchiCAD25, ofcourse Octane & OR-ArchiCAD plugin (love it)
http://www.tapperworks.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/TAPPERWOR ... 9851341126
http://www.youtube.com/user/Tapperworks/videos
- Laticis
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 2:23 pm
- Location: Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
- Contact:
Hi Rappet,rappet wrote:Hi Laticis,Laticis wrote:Scores for 2 X Titan Z's
PT, Alpha shadows off:
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off ( 24.00 ms/s)
...
Did you use Octane 2.12?
If so, can you please test score seperately (both appr 12.00?)
The difference is too big, is it not?
I got one TitanZ with score path term power 0.3, coherent mode of: 15.58 ms/s when >1000 s/px)
cheers,
Ah no I have only been using 2.1, will do add the update and post some new scores.
Cheers
- Laticis
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 2:23 pm
- Location: Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
- Contact:
Hi Rappet,
The new scores. ( an average, not at the highest peak - getting bigger numbers to start with ) these are after about 5 seconds.
PT, Alpha shadows off:
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off ( 30.70 ms/s)
path term power 0 , coherent mode off ( 19.97 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode off (49.44 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode on (46.70 ms/s)
Cheers
The new scores. ( an average, not at the highest peak - getting bigger numbers to start with ) these are after about 5 seconds.
PT, Alpha shadows off:
path term power 0.3, coherent mode off ( 30.70 ms/s)
path term power 0 , coherent mode off ( 19.97 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode off (49.44 ms/s)
path term power 1 , coherent mode on (46.70 ms/s)
Cheers