OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

My overclocked titan and 2600k @4.5 draw about 400W under full load. That's all I can say.
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

PS. How quiet is your 780? What about temps and fan speed?
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
RahiSan
Licensed Customer
Posts: 134
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 7:55 am

Its currently rendering a pretty complex scene and its 67°C.
I have not noticed any difference in noise since I installed it, so its pretty quiet.
Is 67°C okay or worrysome?
Fanspeed is around 1700 rpm
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

I think when it reaches 85 or something it will slow down - reduce clocks automatically. 67C is great on air.
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
User avatar
rappet
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1962
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 3:57 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Hi guys and girls,

Octane 2.06 PT
17.76 Ms/sec (4x580)
33.19 Ms/sec (4x580 + 2xTitan)

added 2.10
Octane 2.10 PT
20.52 Ms/sec (4x580)

added DL:
Octane 2.06 DL vs 2.10 DL
78.49 vs 77.01 Ms/sec (3x580)

added PMC:
Octane 2.06 DL vs 2.10 DL
10.19 vs 8.68 Ms/sec (3x580)

So 2.10 is faster in PT, but slower in DL and PMC ?

greetz,
Attachments
Tapperworks-Benchmark 2.06 4xgpu580+2TitansBlack.JPG

4090+3089ti & Quad 1080ti
ArchiCAD25, ofcourse Octane & OR-ArchiCAD plugin (love it)
http://www.tapperworks.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/TAPPERWOR ... 9851341126
http://www.youtube.com/user/Tapperworks/videos
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Water-cooled overclocked TITAN + 3x780 6GB (I'll send more info soon here http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540, busy day)

Octane 2.10

DL: 189.5 ms/s (approx. same for all values of path term power)
PT 35.4 ms/s (path term power 0.3); 60 ms/s (path term power 1); 25ms/s (path term power 0)
PMC: 10 ms/s (path term power 0); 19 ms/s (path term power 1)

Temp on all GPUs ........................................... 39C :ugeek:
Noise level - 15-16 dB (inaudible)
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
zivko
Licensed Customer
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:41 am

Just got gtx 970, result is 4.26 Ms/sec with pathtracing and 3.61 with pmc (i'm posting that pmc works because i've seen people reporting that 9xx series has problems with pmc)
desktop - win7 64bit, i5-4690, 12gb ddr3, 970gtx 4gb, 460gtx 2gb
laptop - win7 64bit, i7-2630qm, 10gb ddr3, 550m 2gb
User avatar
Gecko3D
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:20 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Octane 2.06 -

DL - 20.84
PT - 6.32
PMC - 4.25

Octane 2.11.1 (with/without Coherent Mode enabled) -

DL - 23.41/20.09
PT - 7.20/6.79
PMC - 1.78 (no coherent mode option)

GPU Temp at 59 degrees or below
Last edited by Gecko3D on Fri Oct 17, 2014 4:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Asus 780 GTX Direct CU II OC (3Gb), Driver release 347.88
Asus P9X79 Pro, 64Gb DDR3, i7 4930K @ 4.5GHz
Windows 7 x64, Lightwave3D 2015, Octane & LW plugin
User avatar
grimm
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:11 pm
Location: Spokane, Washington, USA

I just ran the benchmark on my MSI GTX980:

PT: 3.66 Ms/sec
PMC: fails
DL: 12.0 Ms/sec

Driver issues? Oh, and the card never got above 67c for temp.

Edit: I'm running version 2.11.1 and I also forgot to turn off alpha shadows, here are the new numbers:

PT: 4.4 Ms/sec
PMC: fails
DL: 13.94 Ms/sec

With coherent mode enabled:
PT: 4.7 Ms/sec
DL: 17.49 Ms/sec
Linux Mint 21.3 x64 | Nvidia GTX 980 4GB (displays) RTX 2070 8GB| Intel I7 5820K 3.8 Ghz | 32Gb Memory | Nvidia Driver 535.171
User avatar
rappet
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1962
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 3:57 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

I looked up my old Benchmark to compare. (used release 1.20).

2x Titans Black: 15.03 Ms/sec
2x Titans + gtx275: 15.79 Ms/sec (turned monitorcard on as well)

I swapped the GPU above for 3x 780Ti in the same system with on fan less (I had to remove the bottom fan)
On target power 100% I tested the 780Ti seperately (*) is degrees for the other cards
1x 780Ti n01: 8.23 Ms/sec, 81-(41)-(30) degrees
1x 780Ti n02: 8.12 Ms/sec, (38)-83-(30) degrees
1x 780Ti n03: 8.15 Ms/sec, (43)-(38)-75 degrees

I had to tweak the GPU settings to not get it overheated (it's an AC system).
3x 780Ti: 20.40 Ms/sec,( 83-88-70 degrees)

Greetz,

4090+3089ti & Quad 1080ti
ArchiCAD25, ofcourse Octane & OR-ArchiCAD plugin (love it)
http://www.tapperworks.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/TAPPERWOR ... 9851341126
http://www.youtube.com/user/Tapperworks/videos
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”