OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.06 TEST 4

A forum where development builds are posted for testing by the community.
Forum rules
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Elvissuperstar007
Licensed Customer
Posts: 2506
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Ukraine/Russia
Contact:

Goldisart wrote:caustic - a sore point very slowly it is possible to make a fake without a detailed calculation as in the de Iray render
////////////////////////////////////
https://youtu.be/JwQUU0knPhY

tell me will is work on optimization of caustics ?
+1
win 7 /64x C2Quad 6600 2.4/ Nvidia 9800 GX2 1gb 512 bit + Asus 480 GTX/ DDR2 8Gb / NVIDIA 460 GTX 2GB/2x NVIDIA 580 GTX 3GB
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
vijay
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 196
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 8:42 pm

coilbook wrote:
vijay_thirukonda wrote:
coilbook wrote:exposure in Imager don't forget to also lower the "expected exposure" in Adaptive sampling.


can we get a sync check box next to as exposure not to forget to sync it to camera exposure
Sorry, This cannot be done. Ideally, we have to restart if expected exposure is changed.

does it mean if my camera exposure is set to 6, for example, I should set AS exposure to 6
or AS exposure means how fast direct lit areas are done

It is very hard to understand without visual comparison, samples what the exposure is for.

Please see bellow

" It seems that areas that are directly lit should get a separate noise threshold I think.
Because 0.1- 0.2 is more than enough for direct lit areas but indirectly lit areas especially dark interiors would need around 0.04 or less.

But right now if we set it to 0.03 we waste a lot of time waiting for direct lit areas to reach their noise levels even though they look done way before the system colors them green.

But if we set to 0.1 - 0.2 direct lit areas looks fine but indirect still look grainy because system uses one threshold for both direct and indirect.

Thanks



Isn't this in some way connected with exposure settings? Just guessing...

Maybe because it's related with engine core, it would be better to check all these things in standalone - cause 3ds max is TEST 3 - which is one step behind, Standalone is TEST 4 for now."

Hi,

In a complex scene, dark areas with no direct light will never reach the noise threshold, even after quite high samples the noise estimate is very high. This is why we need expected exposure settings to figure out black and grey pixels. We use this reduce the noise estimate and stop sampling of these pixels at some point, kind of similar to what you are asking for and also due to artifacts we use this to increase min adaptive samples for the dark region. Noise pass will show you how the exposure settings affect the noise estimate.

Thanks
Vijay
User avatar
bepeg4d
Octane Guru
Posts: 10328
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Elvissuperstar007 wrote:
Goldisart wrote:caustic - a sore point very slowly it is possible to make a fake without a detailed calculation as in the de Iray render
////////////////////////////////////
https://youtu.be/JwQUU0knPhY

tell me will is work on optimization of caustics ?
+1
Hi Elvissuperstar007 and Goldisart,
as always, is not so easy what are your needs exactly, at least for me :roll:
Do you need to remove the coustics?
In general, you can cut the coustics with kernel parameters in PT and PMC, while in Direct Light there is no coustics calculation.
Do you mind to share an example orbx scene to better understand which settings are you using?
ciao beppe
User avatar
Elvissuperstar007
Licensed Customer
Posts: 2506
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Ukraine/Russia
Contact:

Octane Motion Blur Issues
https://vimeo.com/211182475
win 7 /64x C2Quad 6600 2.4/ Nvidia 9800 GX2 1gb 512 bit + Asus 480 GTX/ DDR2 8Gb / NVIDIA 460 GTX 2GB/2x NVIDIA 580 GTX 3GB
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
mikinik
Licensed Customer
Posts: 221
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:05 am
Contact:

bepeg4d wrote: Hi Elvissuperstar007 and Goldisart,
as always, is not so easy what are your needs exactly, at least for me :roll:
Do you need to remove the coustics?
In general, you can cut the coustics with kernel parameters in PT and PMC, while in Direct Light there is no coustics calculation.
Do you mind to share an example orbx scene to better understand which settings are you using?
ciao beppe
Here is an example.
0111.jpg
What to do to avoid noise?
r9 3900x/64Gb/2070s/2070/win10x64/3dsmax2021
User avatar
mojave
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 1336
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:35 pm

mikinik wrote:
bepeg4d wrote: Hi Elvissuperstar007 and Goldisart,
as always, is not so easy what are your needs exactly, at least for me :roll:
Do you need to remove the coustics?
In general, you can cut the coustics with kernel parameters in PT and PMC, while in Direct Light there is no coustics calculation.
Do you mind to share an example orbx scene to better understand which settings are you using?
ciao beppe
Here is an example.
0111.jpg
What to do to avoid noise?
Do you get the same noise levels if you increase the resolution of your sphere's geometry?
Hesekiel2517
Licensed Customer
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:57 pm

Hey there,

I tried texturebaking together with adaptive sampling. When i wanted to view the noisemap i got a bluescreen. I tried that again. This time no bluescreen but a lot of cuda errors (719). Maybe adaptive sampling isn't supposed to work with AS. But then there should be a warning

edit: I added a sample file
Attachments
Octane_baking_error.zip
(135.6 KiB) Downloaded 243 times
mikinik
Licensed Customer
Posts: 221
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:05 am
Contact:

mojave , that helped a little. but the noise is still there.
001.jpg
002.jpg
You can remove the restriction on max.samples? For what purpose this restricted?
orbx - https://www.dropbox.com/s/8t18y3tcgf5md ... .orbx?dl=0
r9 3900x/64Gb/2070s/2070/win10x64/3dsmax2021
coilbook
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3032
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:27 pm

i hope octane 3.1 or 4 will deal with noise in volumes. it is almost impossible to have clean fog, volume light or like volume caustics in the post above. cpu renderers definitely render them cleaner and noise free. Why cannot we also have fake volume lights like 3ds max default renderer has?
coilbook
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3032
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:27 pm

why i am not seeing volume caustics like in the picture above?

Thank you


i am not seeing any caustic in octane at all. do i need to enable them?
Attachments
caustics 2.jpg
caustics.jpg
Post Reply

Return to “Development Build Releases”