GeForce TITAN X

Tue Mar 17, 2015 11:13 pm

Reading reviews I am pretty sure I'll watercool titan X at at least 1.4ghz (8 of them in TX10...)

Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:01 am

That is a good price compared to the Titan Black...with 25% more performance

Wed Mar 18, 2015 2:17 am

Wed Mar 18, 2015 8:26 am

Rikk The Gaijin wrote: ... .

Rikk, Thanks for the link.

Wed Mar 18, 2015 8:39 am

Guys! check this out!!!

: titanX in Octanebench Octane Render OTOY.jpg (36.26 KiB) Viewed 3404 times

& now, Ladies & Gentlemen - EK waterBlocks just anounced their waterblocks!

"bit" curious how X is going to swim! =)))

Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:20 am

I don't understand these comparisons...

If I had one Titan X I would compare it with just one Titan, why add a second gpu?

Does Titan X just doubles the speed of the GTX580?

Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:24 am

The question is... Can you stick quad TitanX on air to each other without a slot space like 580classified?
Or do you need slot space between them? If so, TitanZ is still the max, aurely for bottom slot card.

Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:31 am

gabrielefx wrote:I don't understand these comparisons...

If I had one Titan X I would compare it with just one Titan, why add a second gpu?

Does Titan X just doubles the speed of the GTX580?

Yes it seems TitanX is lit bit faster than two 580s.. (though it's a question how precise this data is..)

These comparisos are for all rigs & configurations - to show scaling =) 100 if base performance of 680..

in case of 4x TitanX.. I Guess watercooling makes sense =) & You might be able to get more performance out of Your rig =)

12GB of vRAM is going to be the selling point for quite some..-unlike in a case of TitanZ where it not 12 but 2x6GB =)

The question is... Can you stick quad TitanX on air to each other without a slot space like 580classified?
Or do you need slot space between them? If so, TitanZ is still the max, aurely for bottom slot card.

I think it will be possible - nVidia is selling it's own box with 4x cards

Digits devbox (the question how much performance You are loosing =)

Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:53 am

Tom, thanks for sharing. EK just in time! The Black plain water-block with the black backplate makes X much much faster than 127 score.

Bear in mind what Marcus said - 127 score is on air and stock settings, and if we take into account that it goes at 1000mhz, 1090mhz boost, and 7000mhz memory - while first tests report 1.4ghz, 8ghz memory (and this is still on air!) - this simply means that X can go at
127*(1.4/1.09) = 163

So in four Titan X watercooled setup (or air cooled with extra space on raisers, or Tyan that Tutor has) we should score something around 600. Compared to GTX 580 (score around 65) Titan X should render 2.5 times faster than 580.

Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:59 am

All my gpu workstations are air cooled.
I don't see the problem.
The Silverstone TJ11 is the best case where to fit 4 gpus because the air ventilation is vertical.
Also I use custom curve to pump the fans speed.
In 4 years of hard work, 24/7 gpu computing, I have broken 3 GTX580s, fortunately I had some spare of them.
My 4xGTX680s and 4xTitans work for 2-3 years without any problem. Teslas are more reliable.
It's time to replace my 580s, same case, same processors, same system. That's why I love gpu computing.