Nvidia FERMI cards are coming... tomorrow !

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
User avatar
pixelrush
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:11 pm
Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Really I am disappointed with the specs of these cards..
Very hot ,very noisy and not as fast as they should have been, also more expensive than the competition.
95 deg C, 70db, 850W for SLI system under load!...perhaps I'll hold off for a die shrink...
Still thankfully the 470 is 9.5" and requires 2x 6 pin plugs so it will fit my case/power supply.
I see raytracing is 8x faster, and folding@home is 3.5x faster for 480 than 280 - so maybe the Octane performance gain will make the proposition *passable* :roll:

BTW I see various reviewers lack a benchmark for Cuda performance comparison. Radiance might like to send out Octane with a std test scene to see if it could be adopted- good for publicity too ;)
i7-3820 @4.3Ghz | 24gb | Win7pro-64
GTS 250 display + 2 x GTX 780 cuda| driver 331.65
Octane v1.55
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

pixelrush wrote:Really I am disappointed with the specs of these cards..
Very hot ,very noisy and not as fast as they should have been, also more expensive than the competition.
95 deg C, 70db, 850W for SLI system under load!...perhaps I'll hold off for a die shrink...
Still thankfully the 470 is 9.5" and requires 2x 6 pin plugs so it will fit my case/power supply.
I see raytracing is 8x faster, and folding@home is 3.5x faster for 480 than 280 - so maybe the Octane performance gain will make the proposition *passable* :roll:

BTW I see various reviewers lack a benchmark for Cuda performance comparison. Radiance might like to send out Octane with a std test scene to see if it could be adopted- good for publicity too ;)
i'd love to but i'm %200 occupied finishing beta2.

is there anyone interested in coordinating something like this ?
contacting hardware review sites and giving them a demo version of beta2 once it's released, with a decent test scene ?

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
User avatar
pixelrush
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:11 pm
Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Well its certainly too good an opportunity to pass up.
I think you will need to provide something a bit slicker than a toy aeroplanes scene though...

See here 'Tech Report' typical page of review benchmarking 3d modelling and rendering for processor comparison
http://techreport.com/articles.x/18581/13
Q. Who uses pov ray anyway??

or part of the AnandTech GTX480 review http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3783&p=6
Last edited by pixelrush on Sun Mar 28, 2010 12:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
i7-3820 @4.3Ghz | 24gb | Win7pro-64
GTS 250 display + 2 x GTX 780 cuda| driver 331.65
Octane v1.55
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

i've got heaps of complex scenes, but they all have commercial bought models in them, so they can't be redistributed publically.

maybe we can use one of the CG talk lighting challenge scenes ?

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
User avatar
pixelrush
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:11 pm
Location: Nelson, New Zealand

I dont think it need be very complex, only original and good eye candy for print/web.
You see in the linked examples the scenes are not staggeringly epic..
Probably you dont want to distribute too large a benchmarking package either.

The distinguishing feature I think is that it should be heavy enough to produce a time to say 4000 samples that it can be used meaningfully to compare GPU say for the next 5 years as speed increases, and also not take too long so that the reviewer can do their tests quickly. So say some scene that is *finished* in 20 mins? (currently that is, on a GTX260).
I realise 20 mins is not especially flattering of Octane now and many images can be done in less but you need to think of a 10-20 fold speed up in the future..
Last edited by pixelrush on Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
i7-3820 @4.3Ghz | 24gb | Win7pro-64
GTS 250 display + 2 x GTX 780 cuda| driver 331.65
Octane v1.55
User avatar
pedrojafet
Licensed Customer
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:50 pm
Location: Brazil
Contact:

Sam wrote: OpenCL benchmarks (ATI can run openCL too) shows that the new GTX480 are like 2x faster than the higher end ati card :lol:

2x faster??? What does it means in the overall software running process, like i.e., with Octane???
Win 7 PRO64 | Geforce GTX2750 - 1.8GB | MB ASUS w/ i5 2500 | 8GB
User avatar
pixelrush
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:11 pm
Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Looking around it seems EVGA have the best Fermi solns for *serious* Octane purposes ATM, if you dont mind the extra expense - watercooled single slot cards - http://www.evga.com/articles/00539/
...the radiator with the heat of 3/4 cards going to it will need quite a lot of air though...still thats 1440/1920 cores blasting away... :mrgreen:
i7-3820 @4.3Ghz | 24gb | Win7pro-64
GTS 250 display + 2 x GTX 780 cuda| driver 331.65
Octane v1.55
User avatar
Sam
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1012
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:06 am
Location: Geneva
Contact:

Before speaking about benchmark scene
We should wait for MLT ;)

Its not good to have multiple versions of a benchmark utility
Look at Cinebench, they update it only every years (when they release major C4D updates)
http://Kuto.ch - Samuel Zeller - Freelance 3D Generalist and Graphic designer from Switzerland
RayTracey
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:58 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Contact:

:!: if you want to see how fast Fermi can do raytracing and pathtracing be sure to check out this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEXeTXmCfdE

Can't wait to see Octane running on one of those :D
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”