The most powerful Octane machines.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
I just reran the benchmark on my setup and got 767 seconds, err I mean, thwak. I had some background processes running on the original test that caused lags on the system.
Ubuntu 9.10 x64 | GTS 240 | 260.19.44 drivers | 3.0 Toolkit | Dual-Core 2.4 GHz | 4Gb| Blender 2.56a/latest Yoyoz plugin
WinXP32 | GTS 240 | 266.58 drivers | 3.0 Toolkit | Dual-Core 2.4 GHz | 4Gb | Blender 2.56a/latest Yoyoz plugin
WinXP32 | GTS 240 | 266.58 drivers | 3.0 Toolkit | Dual-Core 2.4 GHz | 4Gb | Blender 2.56a/latest Yoyoz plugin
Hi thwak, 767 thwak, it is higher than before, I have listed it.thwak wrote:I just reran the benchmark on my setup and got 767 seconds, err I mean, thwak. I had some background processes running on the original test that caused lags on the system.
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Hi Metal,
Nice to share your result
But you have to screen grab during the rendering in order to see the MSample per sec rate.
Nice to share your result

But you have to screen grab during the rendering in order to see the MSample per sec rate.
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
isn't it 4,05MSample/s ?
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
My set up - details in my sig - gives steady 0.80 msps from the .ocs
Time to 500 samples is 6m 3s.
So a 480 is 5x faster for about 4.5x the price..or at least thats the $ where I live
Time to 500 samples is 6m 3s.
So a 480 is 5x faster for about 4.5x the price..or at least thats the $ where I live
i7-3820 @4.3Ghz | 24gb | Win7pro-64
GTS 250 display + 2 x GTX 780 cuda| driver 331.65
Octane v1.55
GTS 250 display + 2 x GTX 780 cuda| driver 331.65
Octane v1.55
we should be able to push it to something close to 5Ms/s with more optimizations...pixelrush wrote:My set up - details in my sig - gives steady 0.80 msps from the .ocs
Time to 500 samples is 6m 3s.
So a 480 is 5x faster for about 4.5x the price..or at least thats the $ where I live
Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
Radiance, Just call me 'Yoon', if 'YoonKyung' is difficult to remember ..radiance wrote:the fastest setup reported is by yoonkyun (how do you spell it again!?

Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580