The most powerful Octane machines.

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
User avatar
thwak
Licensed Customer
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:20 am

I just reran the benchmark on my setup and got 767 seconds, err I mean, thwak. I had some background processes running on the original test that caused lags on the system.
Ubuntu 9.10 x64 | GTS 240 | 260.19.44 drivers | 3.0 Toolkit | Dual-Core 2.4 GHz | 4Gb| Blender 2.56a/latest Yoyoz plugin
WinXP32 | GTS 240 | 266.58 drivers | 3.0 Toolkit | Dual-Core 2.4 GHz | 4Gb | Blender 2.56a/latest Yoyoz plugin
YoonKyung
Licensed Customer
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 4:41 am

thwak wrote:I just reran the benchmark on my setup and got 767 seconds, err I mean, thwak. I had some background processes running on the original test that caused lags on the system.
Hi thwak, 767 thwak, it is higher than before, I have listed it.
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
metalpiss
Licensed Customer
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:33 pm
Location: Romania
Contact:

Octane Beta 2.1 + Win7 64 + GTX480 + i7 860 + 8GB = 149 seconds/Ksamples (3.8-3.9 megasamples/second)
Attachments
octane-benchmark.jpg
pixym
Licensed Customer
Posts: 597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

Hi Metal,

Nice to share your result ;)
But you have to screen grab during the rendering in order to see the MSample per sec rate.
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

the fastest setup reported is by yoonkyun (how do you spell it again!? :)

he's getting roughle 11.2 megasamples/sec with 3x GTX480 ;)
a single GTX480 currently does 3.91 megasamples/sec

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
pixym
Licensed Customer
Posts: 597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

isn't it 4,05MSample/s ?
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

pixym wrote:isn't it 4,05MSample/s ?
hmm i may have been mistaken.
maybe his is slightly overclocked.

my GTX480 here does 3.91 M/S

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
User avatar
pixelrush
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:11 pm
Location: Nelson, New Zealand

My set up - details in my sig - gives steady 0.80 msps from the .ocs
Time to 500 samples is 6m 3s.

So a 480 is 5x faster for about 4.5x the price..or at least thats the $ where I live
i7-3820 @4.3Ghz | 24gb | Win7pro-64
GTS 250 display + 2 x GTX 780 cuda| driver 331.65
Octane v1.55
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

pixelrush wrote:My set up - details in my sig - gives steady 0.80 msps from the .ocs
Time to 500 samples is 6m 3s.

So a 480 is 5x faster for about 4.5x the price..or at least thats the $ where I live
we should be able to push it to something close to 5Ms/s with more optimizations...

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
YoonKyung
Licensed Customer
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 4:41 am

radiance wrote:the fastest setup reported is by yoonkyun (how do you spell it again!? :)
Radiance, Just call me 'Yoon', if 'YoonKyung' is difficult to remember .. :)
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Win7 64 | 2x XEON | 12GB | 8x GTX580
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”