I'm in line to get one...it's gonna be FERMI Time!!!cecofuli wrote:I think (hope) lessNot only cuda core, but a new Fermi architecture.
I'm waiting some 470-480 test too.
My little Octane Benchmark
Forum rules
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.
Win 7 64 | 2 X MSI AERO GtX 1070| Intel I7-6850K| 32 GB DDR4 RAM | Asus X99 II-A
Radiance asked me to try out the benchmark with my GTX 470. I used gzavye's octane file for the benchmark.
AUTHOR: DavidT
OS: Windows 7 64bit
Software: Octane v1.02 b2 - 64bit
MACHINE: i7 920
PC RAM: 12 GB
CPU: i7 920
CPU THREAD: 8
CPU TEMP (Core min/max) : --
--------
GPU: Nvidia GTX 470 - 1248 MB RAM
Cores: 112
GPU CLOCK: 607MHz
GPU TEMP: 91°C
RENDETIME: 20m 17sec
AUTHOR: DavidT
OS: Windows 7 64bit
Software: Octane v1.02 b2 - 64bit
MACHINE: i7 920
PC RAM: 12 GB
CPU: i7 920
CPU THREAD: 8
CPU TEMP (Core min/max) : --
--------
GPU: Nvidia GTX 470 - 1248 MB RAM
Cores: 112
GPU CLOCK: 607MHz
GPU TEMP: 91°C
RENDETIME: 20m 17sec
- Attachments
-
Windows 7 64-bit | GTX 470 | i7 920 | 12 GB
hey,
can you post it here too: http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... =21&t=1164
so people can compare with the same scene ?
Thanks,
Radiance
can you post it here too: http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... =21&t=1164
so people can compare with the same scene ?
Thanks,
Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
-
understand
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:05 pm
- Location: berlin
shieet might want to boost the fan speed with EVGA Precision
Win 8.0 64-bit | Gainward 460 GTX 2048mb (driver: latest) | Phenom 965 3.4ghz 140w | 12GB
Win 8.1 64-bit | EVGA 780ti Superclocked 3072mb (driver: latest) | i7 4930k 3.4ghz | 32GB
Win 7 64-bit Bootcamp | 650M 1GB (driver: 327.23) | i7 2.7ghz | 8GB
Win 8.1 64-bit | EVGA 780ti Superclocked 3072mb (driver: latest) | i7 4930k 3.4ghz | 32GB
Win 7 64-bit Bootcamp | 650M 1GB (driver: 327.23) | i7 2.7ghz | 8GB
Yeah, I've read people getting similar temperatures from the Fermi cards, since they run hotter, but I'm going to play around with the vga utility. I'm using the Asus SmartDoctor that came with the card set to autofan. I will play with manual fan settings for different temperatures to increase the fan speed.understand wrote:shieet might want to boost the fan speed with EVGA Precision
Windows 7 64-bit | GTX 470 | i7 920 | 12 GB
@DavidT
Hmmm. GTX 470 have 446 cuda cores. Did you made a typo or device manager sees only 112 cores?
Hmmm. GTX 470 have 446 cuda cores. Did you made a typo or device manager sees only 112 cores?
Octane's device manager shows 112 cores, but it also says the capability mode is 1.0. Perhaps the Fermi optimized build that Radiance mentioned will report these values properly.n1k wrote:@DavidT
Hmmm. GTX 470 have 446 cuda cores. Did you made a typo or device manager sees only 112 cores?
Windows 7 64-bit | GTX 470 | i7 920 | 12 GB
Maybe that is the reason for lower than expected performance. Is it possible that octane uses only 112 cores?
i'm not sure.
I think the cuda 3.0 toolkit has bugs in it, it does'nt seem to detecht the fermi cards propperly, i sent a mail to nvidia to ask them.
i'm not sure it only uses 112 cores.
i don't think so otherwise he would'nt have that temperature when rendering.
Radiance
I think the cuda 3.0 toolkit has bugs in it, it does'nt seem to detecht the fermi cards propperly, i sent a mail to nvidia to ask them.
i'm not sure it only uses 112 cores.
i don't think so otherwise he would'nt have that temperature when rendering.
Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB