Tutorial: Making good quality renders for our competition

Post, discuss and share handy resources like textures, models and HDRI maps in this forum.
Forum rules
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

cgbeige wrote:I'm a professional retoucher - here's the best technique for removing fireflies in my opinion (This is is less destructive than Despeckle, which is better for removing halftone scans, not specks but it's a dated filter and not as good as other noise reduction filters). Use the Dust and Scratches filter with a high threshold setting. It will leave everything untouched and just zap the fireflies:

Before:
http://grab.by/3QbY

After:
http://grab.by/3Qc1

Obviously that's too noisy for a final image but it was just to show that Dust and Scratches can preserve image detail (low contrast detail)

So you can have relatively grainy images and only remove the fireflies. If you want to remove the grain overall, I recommend the Neat Image Photoshop filter. It's very good and I worked at a film magazine (tons of grainy images) and this was the best of the lot (Noise Ninja is good not as good IMO).
thanks, that indeed looks like a much better technique :)

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
nick
Licensed Customer
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:02 am
Location: chicago

is there a filter or technique you would recommend for removing grain and fireflies in an animation using After Effects ?
2x xeon5650 | 3 x titan | Win7 64 | maya2014x64 | mountain mods
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

nick wrote:is there a filter or technique you would recommend for removing grain and fireflies in an animation using After Effects ?
some people have suggested the neat image tool, it seems to have a version for videos too.
use google and check it out.

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
r10k
Licensed Customer
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:12 am

(Noise Ninja is good not as good IMO).
I completely agree with that, although there are instances where NN will beat Neatimage. Not enough to worry about though :)
some people have suggested the neat image tool, it seems to have a version for videos too.
If your video's frames are exported as images, you can simply batch the entire lot in one of the pro versions of Neatimage.
alieneye
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:41 pm
Location: Moscow, Russia

you may use Filters-Noise-Median to remove fireflies instead of Despeckle. It work good on real size image (but add some blur) and perfect with 2x downscaling. in my case it completely remove fireflies. I hope it helps.
i7 860 | gtx480 | windows 7 | 3dsmax 2011
http://alieneye.ru
hadouken
Licensed Customer
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:56 pm
Contact:

great tips here. I understand everything in Radiance's first post except for the path tracing filter option. Where is that? I only see the filter size under path tracing kernel options- and the lowest that will go is 1.0. Can someone tell me where the filter option is please? :?
Intel Core i5-2500
6GB DDR3
GTX470
Windows7 Home Premium 64-bit

http://zaixxiaz.com/
cperkins
Licensed Customer
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:26 pm

Works great in GIMP using Filters>Enhance>Despeckle :D I do more animations than stills so I researched a little and found the Gimp Animation Package (GAP) which allows for batch processing using any of the filter sets, and then some. Here's a link to GAP for GIMP 2.6 + (http://photocomix-resources.deviantart. ... -135464357). You basically open all images in the animation as layers and then apply filter to all layers, then save all layers as individual frames. I forget the exact menu tress I used but if anyone has a problem I'll retrace my steps and post again.
adamrg7
Licensed Customer
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 8:17 pm

does this trick still apply for us using octane v2 or v3. And im using blender. should i be doing this?

also..i have this render that i did and it seems for some reason the best version i did was this one with exposure set to .02 and gamma at 1.4. Then i just turned the power of the lights high enough to have good lighting. And this is the most realistic render ive gotten to date. Why is this? is this normal? should i not be doing this? oh ya and this seems to help clear out noise way faster, i get a better render much faster like this ive noticed on multiple occasions. Once i noticed it created very harsh shadows on the cars though, but im still experimenting why i got harsh shadows with that and not with this particular render that looks so good.
User avatar
bepeg4d
Octane Guru
Posts: 10328
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Hi adamrg7,
wow you have found a very old discussion started almost seven years ago :)
Anyway, yes. The old tricks are always good :)
About your other questions, my suggestion is to open a new topic in the WIP section with a lot of screenshots to explane your progress and doubts:
viewforum.php?f=6
Happy rendering,
ciao beppe
Post Reply

Return to “Resources and Sharing”