
Jules said "very soon" and "real soon" instead of "soon" ....
We are too desperate now hahahah
You mean 10.16.X and so onhobirchina wrote:10.15.5 has been pushed, do we need to start waiting 10.15.6, 10.15.7 ...![]()
![]()
I am also waiting for OctaneX to arrive early, otherwise my MacbookPro will be useless. Waiting always suffers.DERJUNG wrote:You mean 10.16.X and so onhobirchina wrote:10.15.5 has been pushed, do we need to start waiting 10.15.6, 10.15.7 ...![]()
![]()
I really hope Octane X happens very soon and not months from now.
It’s still in closed beta for a little while longer. First public release will run on 10.15.hobirchina wrote:OctaneX promises to release it with the new MacPro at the end of 2019.
In late January 2020, OctaneX said that we are waiting for a new driver, he may appear in 10.15.5.
After a long wait, it is now in late May 2020, which is about to enter June 2020, and MacOS 10.15.5 is officially released and pushed. Should OctaneX stay silent at this time or continue to tell everyone that you need to wait until MacOS 10.15.6? 10.15.7? 10.16?
I have lost faith. This kind of waiting without end is painful. I continue to go back to Windows and use my NVIDIA graphics card.
The Mac platform is essentially more expensive than the Windows platform.Ppedall wrote:I use an iMac Pro with High Sierra and two 1080 ti's in eGPU cases, 64 GB RAM, 10 Cores. This system cost me about 10000 €!!!
After 20 years with Macs and endless waiting for Octane X, I additionally bought a refurbished 5 years old PC: 2x 2080 ti, 128 GB RAM, 24 Cores for 4000 €.
With Octane 2020 and RTX support it is 4,5 times faster than the Mac – for 2,5 times lower price.
So, if Octane X is coming, it hopefully will be as fast or even faster than the CUDA version.
If they just reach the same speed with a Mac Pro for 20000 € this will be the time to say goodbye to Apple even if they have the much much better OS.