Proxy node

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
User avatar
t_3
Posts: 2871
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:37 pm

gah5118 wrote:defidently cant wait for direct integration.... but in argument to using material macro, i do a lot of sharing parts of materials between others. when a macro is used (at least to my knowledge) you have to go inside of the macro which isolates it from using elements from other parts without having to save out and reimport. this would take a lot of time and is aggravating.

it would be nice to see a new "in-between" aka proxy node. again this isnt just for the materials them selves, it could be used for variables or anything to quickly link inputs/outputs. free ice cream for everyone! as far as no one way to approach the interface, true... this just adds to the flexibility and possibilities.
you are right with this one. i personally think that the integrated plugins will solve a lot of workflow/task related problems. i also think that any effort in this area should beter go into such plugins in first place, because a separated render engine, which needs its own material ecosystem, will always be 2nd best in terms of workflow. and i'm pretty sure, that maya is on top of the list of applications which will get this integration...
The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply

1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
gah5118
Licensed Customer
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:25 pm

absolutely. on a completely off subject matter... anyone jumping on BF3 (pc)? www.planbgamers.com come in and join us/have some fun when not rendering
Windows 8.1 | i7 950 | GTX 780ti | 24gb ddr3
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”