OctaneRender® for Maya® 2.26.1 - 7.20.1 Win [OBSOLETE]

Sub forum for plugin releases

Moderator: JimStar

calus
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 9:31 am
Location: Paris

itsallgoode9 wrote: so looks like it's core performance issue? I'll post there and see what's up. Maybe that's expected in V2 with Pascal and I wrongly assumed that you'd get the speed benefits of the new GPU and not just basic functionality so it can run along side the Maxwell GPUS
I don't think it's expected really.. let's see what Abstrax will say about these results.

Also did you actually compare render time for the cards ? (it might be wrong Ms/sec )

and, just in case, did you already test standalone V3 ? if you have the same problem in V3 then the 1080 or the drivers are suspects.
Pascal ANDRE
itsallgoode9
Licensed Customer
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:04 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

I did not check render times but I will do that next.

I did check 1080 vs 780 in V3 using the demo version and the 1080 was faster Ms/sec but only by 25%. I'll make sure to do tests in both scenarios and check the time to the same sampling level and check the image quality at the end as well.
Intel i7-3930K, 64gb RAM, Asus X79 Deluxe mobo, 2x EVGA 780 6gb (for rendering), 1x PNY quaddro k4000 (for display)
Windows 8.1 x64, Maya 2014, Octane Render v2
calus
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 9:31 am
Location: Paris

itsallgoode9 wrote: I did check 1080 vs 780 in V3 using the demo version and the 1080 was faster Ms/sec but only by 25%.
According to octanebench and this topic viewtopic.php?f=9&t=56108

octanebench score:
gtx780 ~= 80
gtx1070 ~= 120
gtx1080 ~= 140

So in V3 the 1080 should give you 75% more speed, not 25%. :shock:
(If your 780 is overclocked or is finally a 780 ti , that would make more sens)

And the V3octanebench used in this topic is unofficial modified V2 version so maybe it's biased.
Pascal ANDRE
itsallgoode9
Licensed Customer
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:04 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

yeah, maybe there's something amiss because I expected 75% as well. Maybe it'll get to then final samples level alot quicker and since I didn't factor that in, it's making my card look slower. I'll test it with the bench as well to amke sure everything is good with the card.
Intel i7-3930K, 64gb RAM, Asus X79 Deluxe mobo, 2x EVGA 780 6gb (for rendering), 1x PNY quaddro k4000 (for display)
Windows 8.1 x64, Maya 2014, Octane Render v2
SimonPercy
Licensed Customer
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 9:42 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

I tested it here:

a 1060GTX 6GB performed equal or sometimes a bit slower than a 780-TI in Maya 2016 SP5 with 7.20.1.
Darkside Studios London
Feature Film & TV Visual Effects and Animation

14 Grays Inn Road, London, United Kingdom
http://www.darksidestudios.uk
calus
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 9:31 am
Location: Paris

SimonPercy wrote:I tested it here:

a 1060GTX 6GB performed equal or sometimes a bit slower than a 780-TI in Maya 2016 SP5 with 7.20.1.
Indeed that's great news, thanks !
this is what was expected,
I think 780ti and 1060 both have similar octanebench score with V3.

So I guess the 1080 speed cut by half is specific to Itsallgood9 for some reason ...
Pascal ANDRE
Post Reply

Return to “Releases”