Forum rules Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
yes, much better camera angle, ar you going for something photorealist or something more fantasy like ?
if you are going for something "fantasy like" than you are on the right track.
but if you are going for photorealism than the contrast is too strong and carpaint is not realistic enough
I actually want go more for realistic look... Not a fantasy track. You say the CarPaint is not realistic enough, what exactlly do you mean? What would be realistic?
- The Contrast is from Photoshop CC (Camera RAW Filter) I could decreas that to almost the origin render form Octane.
- The CarPaint Material is a MixMaterial with one which is like metal sandblasted with a yellow-orangeish color. On top is a 100% reflective black Material which I guess here is the reflectivity too strong. Maybe on both materials. But the CarPaint is the same in real-life like I did for this car.
I dont think that this image look like fantasy. I mean thanks god every favour is different. You're right there is too much of contrast and the CarPaint could be better but these two things doesnt make the image cheep or not-realistic.