OctaneRender™ Standalone v1.0 RC 3 (obsolete)
Forum rules
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.
looks great roubal
The crash reports unfortunately don't point to any particular problem. We don't have a Mac Pro here, so all our testing is happening either on a MacBook Pros or on a Mac mini and there I couldn't reproduce the issues. I guess you tried different CUDA driver versions? What is you hardware configuration and is there a way to reproduce the issues?bepeg4d wrote:Thanks for the new version and for the mac .dmg, unfortunately all the rc os x versions are extremely unstable, it's very difficult to do the benchmarks. here are a couple of crash reports, i hope that you could find a solution
ciao beppe
Is there anybody else who has these problems on Mac OS?
Thanks,
Marcus
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
Hi Jason,grimm wrote:It's looking good!Unfortunately the turntable animation is still broken. At least it doesn't work as it used to. I can select a camera target to rotate around but it still skews the rotation. It is impossible to get the rotation to be limited so it goes around the up axis. Also the camera target position changes as the scene is animated which doesn't seem right to me?
Jason
I'm looking into this but i can't seem to duplicate your problem (or at least not in a way which is problematic).
I do notice the camera target change just slightly on starting the animation. IE: x,y,z of 0,0,10 will change to 0.0000008,0.0000112,10.0000486. However this was the case with 2.58e also.
I'm sure the dev's will know more precisely but i'm fairly confident this will be a by product of the calculations involved in finding the camera path/locations for the frames.
Perhaps you have the camera's "up" parameter slightly off vertical?
Can you give an example or something i can follow to help reproduce your problem here? Maybe post a simple scene that causes your problem?
Cheers
Chris.
thanks marcus for looking into it, i'll try to find a way for reproducing the issue 
ciao beppe

ciao beppe
Thanks for looking at this Chris. I must have had the camera's up off like you suggested, because it's working fine now. I could have sworn I checked it on the last version. So I don't know what I did.
Thanks again,
Jason

Jason
FooZe wrote: Hi Jason,
I'm looking into this but i can't seem to duplicate your problem (or at least not in a way which is problematic).
I do notice the camera target change just slightly on starting the animation. IE: x,y,z of 0,0,10 will change to 0.0000008,0.0000112,10.0000486. However this was the case with 2.58e also.
I'm sure the dev's will know more precisely but i'm fairly confident this will be a by product of the calculations involved in finding the camera path/locations for the frames.
Perhaps you have the camera's "up" parameter slightly off vertical?
Can you give an example or something i can follow to help reproduce your problem here? Maybe post a simple scene that causes your problem?
Cheers
Chris.
Linux Mint 21.3 x64 | Nvidia GTX 980 4GB (displays) RTX 2070 8GB| Intel I7 5820K 3.8 Ghz | 32Gb Memory | Nvidia Driver 535.171
ok, effectively i have found a newest os x nvidia driver and now all seems much more stable:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/macosx-295 ... river.html
ciao beppe
http://www.nvidia.com/object/macosx-295 ... river.html
ciao beppe
Looks greater... And really faster, and colors (especially glossy ones) are better
...
Just got quite a bit of "hot pixels" on same scene`s wrt prv. versions (I hate "hot pixels" and always try to setup to not to have them) but I`m not 100% sure that every parameter was the same, I`ll check it out deeper and write here if I realize something important. I think it was my fault now. (or maybe heterogeneous usage of 5xx and 6xx and FP calculation diffs
).
And about the turntable animation I must say, it was the only disappointing feature for me in Octane. I resolved my problems after giving up to use it
. I am not thinking about "where the mistake is" anymore because I think it`s a concept that must be re-handled, rewritten. As a normal user, as the name says, I was expecting a turntable. But in POV, it is a table that I`m moving around, which effects everything. Many poor renderers solved the problem by selecting a model to rotate in selected axis (in specified degrees/frames). It would be a very easy solution and a big addon for our georgeous renderer. That would also require sticky procedural textures to local corrdinates of the subject model, bla blabla. Anyways, dear Grimm, if you can make a test like unit vector setup (all translations are 1 and camera angle is 45 degrees down, targeted to center of your object) I`m expecting everything to work out fine.
Finally, congratulations and thanks guys... Very good job.

Just got quite a bit of "hot pixels" on same scene`s wrt prv. versions (I hate "hot pixels" and always try to setup to not to have them) but I`m not 100% sure that every parameter was the same, I`ll check it out deeper and write here if I realize something important. I think it was my fault now. (or maybe heterogeneous usage of 5xx and 6xx and FP calculation diffs

And about the turntable animation I must say, it was the only disappointing feature for me in Octane. I resolved my problems after giving up to use it

Finally, congratulations and thanks guys... Very good job.
Win7 64 & Slackware 14 64 | 3x Zotac 580 amp & 1x MSI 680 | i7 3930K @4.8 | 32 GB | Asus rampage extreme IV
Very good news about rc3 congrats otoy team, i have a question regarding the improvement on Keplers.. how is that compared to the 5xxx series fermi based cards now? are they the same? faster? still slower?
Nildo
Nildo
Corei7, 6x GTX1070 (2 Inside and 4 in a CUBIX Xpander), 32GB Ram, Win10 64Bit Home, 3dsMax2017 64Bit, Octane for max 3 and LOVING IT!!!!
MSI GT72S 6QE Dominator Pro G win10Home, gtx 980m.
MSI GT72S 6QE Dominator Pro G win10Home, gtx 980m.
Nice news !!!
Matt
ps : Could you send me and give me more answer about *.ocs file writing process and file description please ?
Matt
ps : Could you send me and give me more answer about *.ocs file writing process and file description please ?
Great news !
Thanks for this new release, I'll give it a go ASAP.
Cheers guys
Thanks for this new release, I'll give it a go ASAP.
Cheers guys

2011 New Year Competition - 2nd Prize winning image
Visit my website: Fairview Studio 3D - Facebook page
i7 Quad-Core 2.67Ghz / 16Gb RAM / Windows 7 64bits / 2x GTX 680 / Octane v2.0 / CUDA Driver 6.0
Visit my website: Fairview Studio 3D - Facebook page
i7 Quad-Core 2.67Ghz / 16Gb RAM / Windows 7 64bits / 2x GTX 680 / Octane v2.0 / CUDA Driver 6.0