The most powerful Octane machines.

[PeterCGS]

PeterCGS : I7 [email protected] 16GB Vista Ultimate SP2 + 480GTX 1,5GB = 248 seconds/Ksamples (2.37 Ms/s)

Can't wait for multiGPU to be enabled! Then I run it again on two 480GTX cards

[radiance]

i can get a out 2,8 megasamples/px instead of 2,3 when i run an optimized kernel,
but it's not %100 stable.
I think we can push this to 3.0 megasamples/px for a GTX480 in the next release, just need some time to experiment.

Radiance

[YoonKyung]

i can get a out 2,8 megasamples/px instead of 2,3 when i run an optimized kernel,
but it's not %100 stable.
I think we can push this to 3.0 megasamples/px for a GTX480 in the next release, just need some time to experiment.

Radiance

I don't think so, you can get more than 4.0 megasamples/px for a GTX480.

[radiance]

i can get a out 2,8 megasamples/px instead of 2,3 when i run an optimized kernel,
but it's not %100 stable.
I think we can push this to 3.0 megasamples/px for a GTX480 in the next release, just need some time to experiment.

Radiance

I don't think so, you can get more than 4.0 megasamples/px for a GTX480.

we'll have to see, i can't make any guarantees
with the current 2.1 RC1, we're not using the cache so it could make a large difference.
still need to figure out how to build them making use of the cache.

Radiance

[YoonKyung]

i can get a out 2,8 megasamples/px instead of 2,3 when i run an optimized kernel,
but it's not %100 stable.
I think we can push this to 3.0 megasamples/px for a GTX480 in the next release, just need some time to experiment.

Radiance

I don't think so, you can get more than 4.0 megasamples/px for a GTX480.

we'll have to see, i can't make any guarantees
with the current 2.1 RC1, we're not using the cache so it could make a large difference.
still need to figure out how to build them making use of the cache.

Radiance

Yes, you can do it.

[thwak]

thwak,

Thank you for your proposal, and that seems to be more reasonable ..
I will change the rule above.

Right now you have invented a new unit, measuring render performance of a machine..
May i use your ID for that new unit?

I am not sure what you are asking me. Are you wanting to use my forum ID for something? Do you want seconds/Ksample to be called a 'thwak'?

[YoonKyung]

thwak,

Thank you for your proposal, and that seems to be more reasonable ..
I will change the rule above.

Right now you have invented a new unit, measuring render performance of a machine..
May i use your ID for that new unit?

I am not sure what you are asking me. Are you wanting to use my forum ID for something? Do you want seconds/Ksample to be called a 'thwak'?

Yes ...

[thwak]

thwak,

Thank you for your proposal, and that seems to be more reasonable ..
I will change the rule above.

Right now you have invented a new unit, measuring render performance of a machine..
May i use your ID for that new unit?

I am not sure what you are asking me. Are you wanting to use my forum ID for something? Do you want seconds/Ksample to be called a 'thwak'?

Yes ...

How funny. Sure! Go for it.

[DavidT]

I posted this info in the GTX4xx benchmark thread, but thought I would post it here also. I'm running Windows 7 64bit, i7 920, 12Gb, and one GTX 470. I just downloaded and tested the newest build released today and my score went from 2.06 megasamples to 3.08 megasamples.

It looks like all the Fermi users will have to update their stats.

[YoonKyung]

I posted this info in the GTX4xx benchmark thread, but thought I would post it here also. I'm running Windows 7 64bit, i7 920, 12Gb, and one GTX 470. I just downloaded and tested the newest build released today and my score went from 2.06 megasamples to 3.08 megasamples.

It looks like all the Fermi users will have to update their stats.

Thank you for your sharing your machine's status, BTW could you let us know the 'seconds/Ksamples' of standard benchmark scene, and screen shot too?