At the speed the price of 580s on ebay are falling it might be worth it to buy more of those instead!
currently at almost $330 for a 580 vs $550 for a 30% increase?
Hmmm
Kepler lineup
- tehfailsafe
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:27 pm
windows 7 64 bit| GTX580 1.5Gb x2 | Intel 2600k @ 4.9 | 16gb ddr3 | 3ds max 2012
Benchmarks leaked... Seems like its going to be a bit overrated.... Hopefully NVIDIA can do something with the drivers to help GPU rendering performance... either that or they are limiting performance on purpose to force us to tesla cards?


Convergen | Adelaide Australia
Windows 7 x64 | GTX 580 1.5GB | 12GB DDR3 | Core i7 920 @ 3.6ghz
Windows 7 x64 | GTX 580 1.5GB | 12GB DDR3 | Core i7 920 @ 3.6ghz
still opencl; the picture might change completely for sp cuda apps like octane. and if not, gamers, cheaply selling their 5xx cards will feed the supply chain for a long while 

„The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply ‟
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
I would wait at least half a year anyways before buying one of the GTX6x0, because as always, availability, prices and maturity of the drivers will be terrible in the first few months.
Looking at the benchmark above, Nvidia doesn't seem to be the best choice for OpenCL anyways and the GTX680 are expected to perform slightly better than GTX580 but with much lower energy consumption. Therefore you pay more for the GTX680 compared to the GTX580 but on the other hand your electricity bill will be lower
Looking at the benchmark above, Nvidia doesn't seem to be the best choice for OpenCL anyways and the GTX680 are expected to perform slightly better than GTX580 but with much lower energy consumption. Therefore you pay more for the GTX680 compared to the GTX580 but on the other hand your electricity bill will be lower

- gabrielefx
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:00 pm
if Octane was compatible with OpenCL I buy AMD and bye bye Nvidia.
I don't understand why Amd builds 3Gb graphic cards with 2x the Nvidia performances.
I will buy one Tesla only if it will have 3x the same chip GTX performances and 10x the vram amount.
I don't understand why Amd builds 3Gb graphic cards with 2x the Nvidia performances.
I will buy one Tesla only if it will have 3x the same chip GTX performances and 10x the vram amount.
quad Titan Kepler 6GB + quad Titan X Pascal 12GB + quad GTX1080 8GB + dual GTX1080Ti 11GB
better opencl performance imo not necessarily means that the true world performance is much different from a cuda solution of the same problem. of course it is impossible to judge because afaik there isn't a platform which is able to use both. but since gaming performance is not that much different, i doubt that using opencl (and ati) would really boost speeds. it would make of course a wider range of computing possible, including the cpu, but octane won't walk that path anywaygabrielefx wrote:if Octane was compatible with OpenCL I buy AMD and bye bye Nvidia.
I don't understand why Amd builds 3Gb graphic cards with 2x the Nvidia performances.
I will buy one Tesla only if it will have 3x the same chip GTX performances and 10x the vram amount.

„The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply ‟
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
- gabrielefx
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:00 pm
someone believe in the new beast...t_3 wrote:better opencl performance imo not necessarily means that the true world performance is much different from a cuda solution of the same problem. of course it is impossible to judge because afaik there isn't a platform which is able to use both. but since gaming performance is not that much different, i doubt that using opencl (and ati) would really boost speeds. it would make of course a wider range of computing possible, including the cpu, but octane won't walk that path anywaygabrielefx wrote:if Octane was compatible with OpenCL I buy AMD and bye bye Nvidia.
I don't understand why Amd builds 3Gb graphic cards with 2x the Nvidia performances.
I will buy one Tesla only if it will have 3x the same chip GTX performances and 10x the vram amount.

http://blog.renderstream.com/2012/03/pr ... d-systems/
3X performance....we will see...

quad Titan Kepler 6GB + quad Titan X Pascal 12GB + quad GTX1080 8GB + dual GTX1080Ti 11GB
If only the hardware reviewing sites were not retarded and actually tested the card for the CUDA performance. But not, down to the last of them, they are all about games, games, games...
Intel Core i7 980x @ 3,78GHz - Gigabyte X58A UD7 rev 1.0 - 24GB DDR3 RAM - Gainward GTX590 3GB @ 700/1400/3900 Mhz- 2x Intel X25-M G2 80GB SSD - WD Caviar Black 2TB - WD Caviar Green 2TB - Fractal Design Define R2 - Win7 64bit - Octane 2.57
German site tested and it looks really bad.
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/graf ... ucomputing
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/graf ... ucomputing
PURE3D Visualisierungen
Sys: Intel Core i9-12900K, 128GB RAM, 2x 4090 RTX, Windows 11 Pro x64, 3ds Max 2024.2
Sys: Intel Core i9-12900K, 128GB RAM, 2x 4090 RTX, Windows 11 Pro x64, 3ds Max 2024.2
mh, but still no cuda test. this is either directx dc or opencl... so we still have hopembetke wrote:German site tested and it looks really bad.
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/graf ... ucomputing

EDIT: and yes, by the way refractive/otoy; if you have a minute or two

don't let luxmark fill this gap alone

„The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply ‟
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400