This is part of an opera house I'm currently designing (thesis project): designed in Revit, and rendered in Octane. Black and white done in post.
tim
Here's an exterior shot.
My interest is more in capturing and communicating the design idea and less in photorealism...In my opera house
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
From Revit to Octane... How?
I use Revit ->Max ->whatever (Mental Ray, Maxwell, Octane)...
My interest is more in capturing and communicating the design idea and less in photorealism...
Don't say that... making something beautiful is always the way to persuade someone...
Since you make an image, it has to be nice... not just an image...
I use Revit ->Max ->whatever (Mental Ray, Maxwell, Octane)...
My interest is more in capturing and communicating the design idea and less in photorealism...
Don't say that... making something beautiful is always the way to persuade someone...
Since you make an image, it has to be nice... not just an image...
AutoCAD,Revit Architecture, Max Design (all 2012) , Moi3D,Maxwell Render,Octane Render
Intel i7-8Gb RAM - Win7x64 - GTX550Ti
Intel i7-8Gb RAM - Win7x64 - GTX550Ti
Hi JJTTBB:
Fair comment: I am somewhat insecure about my aesthetic instincts. But there is a beauty in abstraction, and I think that every artist has to find a place where the right things are being communicated with respect to their vision. For me a lot of the interest in architecture is understanding how space and materials and experience come together: there's a strategic and conceptual aspect to that kind of design that is important, and not purely about visual beauty.
Partly I am reacting against a lot of renderings that seem to be beautifully presented versions of not very beautiful or well-designed things.
I do try to create persuasive images (perhaps not successfully?) But I'd be interested in your view of what makes an image "nice" in this context.
With respect to my workflow for this project, it's Revit / FBX / Max / Octane, although I've had a lot of trouble with crashes in the FBX processor in Max. I link the FBX as a reference so I can re-use the material settings in Max each time I update the Revit model.
Thanks for your note,
tim
Fair comment: I am somewhat insecure about my aesthetic instincts. But there is a beauty in abstraction, and I think that every artist has to find a place where the right things are being communicated with respect to their vision. For me a lot of the interest in architecture is understanding how space and materials and experience come together: there's a strategic and conceptual aspect to that kind of design that is important, and not purely about visual beauty.
Partly I am reacting against a lot of renderings that seem to be beautifully presented versions of not very beautiful or well-designed things.
I do try to create persuasive images (perhaps not successfully?) But I'd be interested in your view of what makes an image "nice" in this context.
With respect to my workflow for this project, it's Revit / FBX / Max / Octane, although I've had a lot of trouble with crashes in the FBX processor in Max. I link the FBX as a reference so I can re-use the material settings in Max each time I update the Revit model.
Thanks for your note,
tim
Mac Pro 3,1 / Lion / 14G RAM / ATI HD 2600 / nVidia GTX 470
i5-750 / Windows 7 Pro 64bit / 8G RAM / Quadro FX 580
Revit 2011, SketchUp 8, Rhino
i5-750 / Windows 7 Pro 64bit / 8G RAM / Quadro FX 580
Revit 2011, SketchUp 8, Rhino