Hi Sam - I have responded to this issue at https://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=67264&p=351962#p351962.-Supporting Revit lights without having to modify our existing lights (adding an emissive surfaces in each light fixture)
I need to get a C4R license in order to investigate this. I will initiate this.Supporting C4R
As said in the other thread, this is not a trivial change, so not something I can look at in the short-term.Could you consider to fix the material in link's issue?
Every Revit project in our office has linked files, so I would have this as a major priority.
face_off wrote:With regards to the link files issue, after some analysis, I can see 2 viable options for this.
1) Lock each Octane material to the source (linked) file. So if A.RVT is a linked file loaded by MAIN.RVT, the geometry will be loaded from A.RVT, and the Octane Materials stored in A.RVT will be used on the A.RVT geometry. If there is a "MyMaterial" material in A.RVT and a "MyMaterial" material MAIN.RVT, then the MAIN.RVT Octane material will be used on MAIN.RVT geometry and the A.RVT Octane material will be used on the A.RVT geometry. Octane materials in linked files will not be able to be material picked or edited. If you want to change the Octane material allocated to geometry in a linked file, you will need to open that linked file and edit the Octane material there.
2) Octane materials would be matched by material name (as opposed to the current method of matching by the internal Revit element id). That means all geometry in the scene with a material name of "MyMaterial" would use the same Octane material named "MyMaterial" from MAIN.RVT. Any Octane materials stored in linked file would be ignored.
Please let me know your preference. Both options above are complex to implement, so I will need your support to test the change, and your understanding if there are on-going problems getting the change robust.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests